George Lucas Educational Foundation
Subscribe to RSS

The Pros and Cons of Computer Labs

Mary Beth Hertz

HS Art/Tech Teacher in Philadelphia, PA
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Share

I have spent six of my almost nine years of teaching in a computer lab. Over that time, my feelings about computer labs have fluctuated. It may seem silly for me to be in opposition to my own job, but there are times that teaching in a lab can be frustrating and isolating. On the other hand, there are times when I realized that there is no other place that my students would be learning how to program, edit videos, create music or format text documents.

Neither of the schools in which I have been the technology teacher have had a library, a librarian or access to much classroom technology in student hands. As such, I have found that my role as the "Computer Teacher" has actually been many roles. In that way, the computer lab was an important place in these schools. On the other hand, it is challenging to try connecting what is taught in the lab with what students are learning in their classrooms, which is, in my opinion, the ideal way to structure technology education.

Another challenging part of teaching in a computer lab is the room layout itself. Most labs contain desktops lined up against a wall in either rows or pods. These layouts, due to wiring and cables, are not mobile or adaptable. In my lab, my younger students can barely see over their computers to follow what is going on at the board. In other labs I have visited or seen, students must turn their bodies to view the board.

Making It Work

Most computer labs are also not laid out well for group work. Technology lends itself to project-based learning, and this can be hard to manage or coordinate in a classroom that is not conducive to moving furniture or creating space for groups or teams to work. Often, the computer takes up most of the desk or table space, too, so there is less room for teams to work out ideas before creating them on the computer. A lot of this work must be done in the classroom before they get to the lab, which means that, even when groups are ready to start creating on the computer, they must wait until the day they use the computer lab. This interrupts the creative and design process and inserts an artificial break between the work students are doing and the technology they are using.

However, despite this, I know that there are certain computer literacy skills students are taught in a computer lab that make integrating technology in the classroom easier. If a teacher knows that students have a period or two each week for learning how to edit video, format text, manage files or create websites, then that is less instructional time in the classroom they have to spend teaching these skills. It allows them to focus on the content and process rather than specific computer skills.

Basic pros and cons of computer labs:


  • Each student has a machine. Unlike classroom pods or clusters in the library, most computer labs have enough machines for each student.
  • Focused computer literacy instruction. Computer labs that have a teacher and are not just a room of computers provide students access to specialized computer literacy education.
  • Provide access in schools with no libraries or funding for large tech initiatives. The bottom line is, if a school does not have a library or can't afford to put a lot of technology into its classrooms, then a computer lab is a viable solution to provide access to students for digital learning.


  • Limited access as a shared resource. Since labs are separate from the classroom, they are not immediately available and are often shared among many classes.
  • Technology removed from classroom. When students have to travel to the computer lab, it means that technology is not truly integrated into the curriculum. Having technology in a separate room sends the message that technology is separate from what students are learning in the classroom.
  • Room layout. This could be one of the most frustrating things about teaching in a computer lab. The layouts of most computer labs are rigid and fixed and do not lend themselves easily to dynamic lessons or projects. In addition, there is rarely room for real work, since keyboards and mice usually take up most of the desktop space.

If you have discovered any additional pros or cons in the computer lab at your school, please share them in the comments section below.

Was this useful?

Comments (24) Sign in or register to comment Follow Subscribe to comments via RSS

Tony Nelson's picture
Tony Nelson
Member of a company that designs technology furniture for education

Great points. As someone who works for a manufacturer of technology furniture for educational uses, it's great to see this view from the inside.
There is probably no one good answer to the cons you put up, but one solution may be a "self-storing" computer desk. These are desks that have storage capabilities for the computer and peripherals - monitor, mouse, and keyboard - taking them out of the way when not needed. This does a couple of things for an institution. By using the self-storing desk, a room is now multi-functional and can be used as both a computer lab and a lecture classroom. This puts the students in the classroom and when needed, in the computer lab.
Room layout is often a big challenge whether in a computer lab or in normal classroom settings. However, there are solutions for this, too. Collaboration tables with single large displays can be used with a single computer connected, or multiple computers or mobile devices. Alternatively, there are also collaboration tables with the same type of self-storing capabilities so the table can be used as a collaborative table with and without a computer.
So, there are solutions to your cons, but not all will be appropriate in every situation.

Matthew Gudenius's picture
Matthew Gudenius
Teacher, Computer Programmer / Engineer, and Educational Technologist

And I agree with much of what is said here.

I have acknowledged, time and again, that it is really a better paradigm to have technology readily available within the classroom and integrated into all of the learning. It's a tool -- much like pencils, or paper. We integrate those into the classroom, so there's no reason not to update it with the digital equivalent.

I have also acknowledged that, in such a utopian paradigm, my job should theoretically not even exist. However, in reality I (and my lab) are needed because the vast majority of teachers do not have the technological know-how and computer literacy to use them in their classes. Thus, students can come to me and get some integral techno-skills... or they can not receive them at all.

My hope is that the days of labs and specialized "computer teachers" (aside from programming and other highly-technical, vocational skills) will soon be numbered, and simply being a "classroom teacher" will automatically mean you are also a "technology teacher"

Ivana's picture
Primary French teacher from Ontario Canada (Kitchener)

"This is a great blog, and I commend you on your years in the field as a technology teacher, constantly searching for new ways to accommodate your lessons and the space you have for the benefit of your students. My comment will soley be around one of your 'cons' related to removing technology from the classroom. "When students have to travel to the computer lab, it means that technology is not truly integrated into the curriculum." Although I understand why this is in the cons section, I don't agree with the fact that technology is not 'truly' integrated into the curriculum unless you have direct access to computers at all times. Teachers must face the realities of the school culture and adapt to work with what they have. This does not mean we cannot be creative and still integreate technology as do teachers that have all the necessary tools right at their fingertips. Having said that, I am still trying to remember if I have ever been in a classroom where every teacher has all the necessary tools and gagets to 'trully' integrate technology and make it a part of the students' everyday lives. Most classes I've had a chance to see (and I've seen quite a few having been supply teaching for a few years) have one, or two computers at most. Some if they're really advanced have a smartboard and digital projector as well. It is unethical to assume that every school will be able to afford to place a computer or other digital tools in every classroom. There are many communities, where parent council donate a lot of money for new Ipads and other gagdets, where other schools might focus on providing their students with breakfast programs every morning. It would be ideal to see every classroom becoem equipped with all these great tools, but we must be realistic, and recognize that society does not work that way, and as teacher I will work twice as hard to be creative and resourceful and find ways of integrating technology despite the lack of necessary tools."

Ryan Brasser's picture
Ryan Brasser
Junior Business Education Major in College

Even though there are cons to Computer Labs in schools, I believe they are a necessity. Ideally, schools would have a 1:1 technology initiative where students would be able to carry a laptop computer with them to each class. If this is not possible, schools may look into a mobile lab, where there are multiple laptops on a cart. But, if the only technology available to a school is a computer lab, flexibility must be required on the teacher's part because integrating technology into any classroom is important.

Kimberly Faye McClellan's picture
Kimberly Faye McClellan
High School Art Instructor

[quote]You have just inspired a future blog post---what will the "computer lab of the future" look like? Something definitely needs to change. We've been having these same conversations for way too long.[/quote][quote]You have just inspired a future blog post---what will the "computer lab of the future" look like? Something definitely needs to change. We've been having these same conversations for way too long.[/quote][quote]You have just inspired a future blog post---what will the "computer lab of the future" look like? Something definitely needs to change. We've been having these same conversations for way too long.[/quote]

Kimberly Faye McClellan's picture
Kimberly Faye McClellan
High School Art Instructor

Thanks for sending out those positive vibes Mary Beth Hertz. I am here reviewing this article again and reflecting.

I am still using technology as any person in this place and time with the capabilities should. I am still in the process of requesting an art room studio with square footage and lab space combined to get back to the past which oddly for me... was the future. Yes, I'm going back to the future 'pun intended'.

I think one hurdle we have as educators is the digital divide. As an artist and organizer I compartmentalize but I also dissect. Compartmentalizing without dissecting may be part of the equation with this digital divide between generations.

I see this happening more and more with educators than with our students. I'm '40' and I grew up as the daughter of an 'digital' entrepreneur. Maybe I just think a bit... different?

Carol's picture

At my school, there is one main computer lab. Students attend classes once or twice a week and I am only able to take some classes down if there happens to be an open lab time, which does not always align to when I have instructional time.

As Mary Beth Hertz wrote, the ideal way to structure technology education is to connect what is taught in the lab to what the students are learning in their classrooms.

Based on experience, what are some of the best ways you have found to integrate technology with classroom instruction and create strong connections when a computer lab is the only resource for technology?

Laura Bradley, MA, NBCT's picture
Laura Bradley, MA, NBCT
Middle school English/Digital Design/Broadcast Media teacher

Carol, your question is exactly what prompted me to start looking for resources to bring technology into my classroom. The central computer lab makes technology a "special," separate from our classroom work, which makes it pretty difficult to fully integrate it and connect it to classroom instruction. A grant from a local education foundation funded laptops for my classroom, but I have also seen teachers gradually bring laptops to their students with grants for a few Chromebooks at a time from Once our district saw what we were doing with technology, they started focusing efforts on making our entire district 1:1 so that every students had that kind of access in every classroom. Grant writing is hard, but well worth it!

Phyllis's picture

I am a former H.S Business Ed teacher (think, typing, shorthand, etc.) looking to get back in the classroom after 25 years. My passion is beginning keyboarding. I'm trying to figure out what (or if) classroom and/or technology teachers do to teach touch-keyboarding. What training or education do new teachers receive? From what I've observed as a sub and read in the last year or two, it seems students are taught with a computer program that, yes, can verify correct keystrokes, but cannot take the place of a trained instructor observing and correcting for correct fingering, posture, looking at fingers, etc. If this is done in a classroom with only a couple of computers, the teacher will most likely be doing something with other students. If done in a computer lab without a trained instructor, pretty much the same result -- bad habits that limit the student.

There is over 100 years of research on typing/keying by touch; other than adding some keys, the computer keyboard hasn't changed. I had an entire methods class that was only about typewriting. It is possible that students may be able to reach the Common Core standard of somewhere around 20-25 wpm by about 4th grade and typing "3 pages" in one sitting, but I believe they will never progress much beyond that without proper keyboarding instruction.

I would love to have feedback on my comments, along with reference resources, articles, etc.

Sign in to comment. Not a member? Register.