Scientists and Artists Type Their Intelligence
Noted intellectuals make it clear that great minds rarely think alike.
Editor's Note (2015): Additional research is needed to understand the applications of Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences in educational settings. Furthermore, a clear distinction should be made between multiple intelligences (how people process information) and learning styles (how people approach tasks differently). Research, however, does suggest that providing students with multiple ways to learn content improves learning (Hattie, 2011). Read more about the research on multiple intelligences and learning styles.
We contacted some big thinkers, from primate experts to a novelist to an astrophysicist, to learn about their particular brands of intelligence. As Howard Gardner, Harvard University professor and MI's visionary theorist, might have predicted, these folks indeed have their own ways of thinking about intelligence. Each was aware of a personal path to understanding, and each path was unique.
Take a look at these mini-interviews, then comment below about what you think. How would you describe your own intelligence? Was it recognized and encouraged in school?
Jane Goodall is one of the world's leading primatologists and founder of the Jane Goodall Institute for Wildlife, Research, Education, and Conservation. She is devoted to ensuring habitat conservation and the well-being of chimpanzees and other primates.Photo credit: Courtesy of Greg Schaler
Jane Goodall: I'd say my intelligence is initially intuitive, and then requires me to spend time trying to deeply understand whatever problem I am trying to come to grips with.
My intelligence was recognized by those teachers who saw beyond bad spelling and bad writing! But that did not matter; my mother both recognized and encouraged my interests. She supported my interests when others laughed at them. She taught me that if someone differed from me in their thinking, first I should carefully listen and understand. Then I should think about what they said and see if it changed my mind; if not, I should have the courage of my convictions.
There was no television, and I spent hours reading books and in libraries. And I learned from nature. My bond with my dog -- my spontaneous learning about his intelligence -- greatly expanded my mind.
Robert M. Sapolsky
Robert M. Sapolsky is a professor of biology, and a professor of neurology and neurological sciences and (by courtesy) neurosurgery, at Stanford University. He is also the author of Why Zebras Don't Get Ulcers, A Primate's Memoir: A Neuroscientist's Unconventional Life Among the Baboons, and Monkeyluv: And Other Essays on Our Lives as Animals.Photo credit: Courtesy of Linda Cicero/Stanford News Service
Robert M. Sapolsky: I think that I've been lucky in that I am pretty evenly balanced between plain old off-the-rack intelligence (the factoid world), working really hard (a necessity in science, where you have to mindlessly do the same thing over and over in order to get anything done), and creativity. In terms of learning best, I have a real penchant for learning from (and teaching with) metaphors.
In high school, [I] was wondrously fostered -- I went to this experimental, hippie neo-'60s high school based on John Dewey's philosophies. I had a spectacular time there.
Junot Díaz is the winner of the 2008 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction for his novel The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao. He is a professor in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Program in Writing and Humanistic Studies.Photo credit: Courtesy of Lily Oei
Junot Díaz: I have a heightened sense of narrative structures, whether it's in a story or a court case or an argument. In other words, I have superb structure logic. I'm also able to synergize enormous amounts of disparate unrelated material. I am a gifted communicator, able to convey importance and enthusiasm and to translate complex abstractions into compelling, accessible (and sticky) narratives. I have a tremendous capacity for play.
I was placed in seventh grade into gifted-and-talented classes. But I was the only kid of color in that class, and the only kid from a poor background. By my last year of high school, I had basically failed out. I cultivated my mind primarily on my own, through dint of reading and force of will -- which explains its many deficiencies but also some of its striking original strengths. For this reason, libraries and access to other smart kids were fundamental to my development.
Andrea Ghez is a professor of astronomy at the University of California at Los Angeles and a 2008 MacArthur Fellow. She is focused on developing high-spatial-resolution imaging techniques to investigate star formation and the massive black hole posited to exist at the center of our galaxy.Photo credit: Courtesy of Andrea Ghez
Andrea Ghez: My best attempt to characterize my intelligence is that I'm a problem solver. I love puzzles, and that is how I think of most of my research. I question assumptions. I'm not afraid of being separate from the pack in my approach to my work -- in fact, I like being separate from the pack.
I learn best on my own. I need to struggle through the new material so that I can see the connections to what I already know -- like putting together the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.
I was fortunate enough to go to the University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, which really focused on teaching students how to learn and think independently, without the restricting notion that there might be only one way. I think this allowed me, and many others, to find a personal mode of learning and questioning. It also taught me how to learn (as opposed to just knowing the facts.) I have become increasingly aware that this was a really magical school.