George Lucas Educational Foundation
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Share

There is a growing buzz in the education community about the possibility of moving away from traditional textbooks. While the objective seems clear as to why we should be making this move, the question of how to transition this great shift remains. Educators creating their own digital resource for the classroom possesses great value, but at this point there are still more questions than answers. A group of Massachusetts educators got together and tried to answer some of the lingering questions.

Two weeks ago Burlington Public Schools hosted the first Massachusetts Digital Publication Collaborative. For four days attendees from all over MA came to Burlington High School. The topic: creating a digital publication that students could use with an iPad. It had never been done in this fashion, at least to my knowledge. While the takeaway seemed to be a tangible product every teacher could immediately use in his or her classroom, there was something much bigger happening. Lines of communication and collaboration were opening among districts. Teachers were connecting, learning and creating transparently. In the next four days we, as a collection of content area teachers, instructional technologists, principals, superintendents, and the MA commissioner of education, Mitchell Chester, joined together to create digital publications for our curriculum and build a community of learners focused on improving and evolving their classroom practice.

Multi-District Collaboration

This initiative started with collaboration between Burlington Public Schools administration, educational technology, IT staff and Apple. We designed a website that included a registration form on the front page and blasted out the event details along with the website to all middle and high school principals and superintendents. After a week of being live, the registration tally hovered around 80 participants from roughly ten districts in Massachusetts.

Teachers' Voice
The first day began with teachers, about to embark on their first week of summer vacation, coming together to share ideas about curriculum and best practices. This initiative was not about technology, but more about creating engaging curriculum, which in turn yields dynamic learning environments. The devices of technology simply supported our collaboration and allowed the process to live on beyond the four days in June and reach a broader audience.

The first day of the MA digital collaborative was designed to present an overview of our goals as a multi-district collaborative. Superintendents Dr. Eric Conti, Burlington Public Schools, Dr. Marinel D. McGrath, Andover Public Schools, and Dr. Maureen LaCroix, Bedford public schools stressed the need for districts in MA to open up district lines and share what is happening in their schools and classrooms. Conti added that we have the tools and devices in our hand to make these collaborations a reality.

Copyright Concerns
The focus shifted momentarily towards copyright and fair use guidelines in education as well as an overview of Creative Commons licensing. Burlington Public Schools Director of Technology, Dennis Villano, and myself led this conversation. We stressed the importance of citing work, but at the same time promoted the idea of collecting information beyond text. This is where we presented creative commons. At the moment, the majority of the audience had not heard about Creative Commons. While this overview was brief, it was imperative that we cover and cite our tracks. Creative Commons and citation of copyrighted material became a daily talking point as we moved forward.

Creating an ePub
Paul Facteau from Apple conducted the next session. Paul detailed the collaborative collection process via a wiki and presented a overview of pages. Paul detailed the workflow we would be using for creating an ePub over the next few days. He also stressed that we should focus on collecting and gathering our curriculum rather than racing towards a finished product. In short, the next four days would be more about the process than the finished product.

Content Collaboration
After the opening keynotes, the audience was released and began to coordinate in cohorts based on content area and discipline level. The organizers of the event took a deep breath and proceeded to watch the day unfold. We posted a Google form on the website to glean feedback about the day. While most of the responses were positive, we had a few that sought more direction. Creative Commons and the wiki were two other common trouble spots that were voiced after day one. We began the next day covering all of the trouble spots we heard about on day one. We also made sure our instructional technology team hovered around each cohort for help with any problems that may impede the process.

ePub Showcase
The next few days ran smoothly. On Wednesday the Massachusetts Commissioner of Education, Mitchell Chester, came to observe our progress. Teachers from Bedford High School presented a physics lesson using the iPad, and math teachers from Burlington High School showcased the first few chapters of their applied math ePub. The commissioner also observed a demonstration of Socrative, a student response, assessment tool for the classroom, led by Ben Berte.


Overall, the week was a success. While many teachers did not leave with a finished book, they left with something greater. They left having experienced a new process for curriculum design. Teachers that never worked together before because of district isolation were now sharing their expertise. As I observed many of the content area cohorts, I heard and witnessed collaborative learning amongst professionals. Curriculum binders were open and visible to others. Best practices were flying around the room in various forms. Teachers, who normally worked alone, because of district lines or departmental isolation, were now working in communion with one another.

Everyone involved in this event walked away better than when we entered Monday morning. While the common objective of all participants was to create an ePub, participants walked away with much more. They walked away with new colleagues that they could connect and share with in the future. They walked away with fresh ideas about their discipline. Everyone involved walked away as an ambassador for shared and transparent learning.

And this led to my final takeaway. These four days, while fixed on a common objective, struck a bigger chord with me. The more education evolves, the more it stays true to its roots. Technology does not dramatically change education; it allows us to open it up in different directions. Teachers will always teach, and dynamic pedagogy will always drive the education vehicle forward. The education field always need experts in specified content areas that are able to adapt and innovate their practices from year to year. What technology allows us to do is create broader communities from which we can learn and share.

Was this useful?

Comments (8) Sign in or register to comment Follow Subscribe to comments via RSS

Tom Fanning's picture
Tom Fanning
Middle school ed tech teacher at Amherst Regional Middle School

Wise words from Mr. Marcinek, and bravo to all who participated here. I'll be reading your work and sharing it with the leadership in my school district. I've been waiting since the late '70s to integrate technology and watch our students open up with, write, think, etc.

Michael Arfaras's picture

Mr. Marcinek, I like that you raised the issue of educators providing their own electronic resources for their students. I agree that this has the potential of being a powerful educational tool. However, as you said, putting this in practice for all students, including those without computer access at home, has some kinks to work out.

Eric's picture
EBD Teacher

Mr. Marcinek, It seems as though you have a really well thought out plan. My question is how did you get all of the teachers to go along with it?

Joyce Harris's picture

As we may know that not all students have computer or ipads in their home so what's going happen to those students who lack these items? Of course its a great idea but I'm concern for those student that are not as fortunate as other to own such items as a computer or ipad.

Laura Thomas's picture
Laura Thomas
Director, Antioch University New England Center for School Renewal, Author of Facilitating Authentic Learning, Director of the Antioch Critical Skills Program; Elementary Library Media Specialist

Joyce, I think you make a great point. The digital divide is pervasive and many of us can forget that our students don't have the access we assume. I think there is some interesting potential in terms of 1-1 initiatives and expanded school hours for computer lab access. I've also been reading lately about projects that provide computers, training and tech support to families via low-interest or no-interest financing- though they are all in their infancies.

I've found some interesting information here as well: Are you familiar with their work?

Lisa Dabbs's picture
Lisa Dabbs
Educational Consultant. Author. Speaker. Blogger.

It's great to see the work that Andy is doing in MA. I've known Andy virtually and met him in person this past summer and can tell you that he has tremendous passion for this work. It takes a tremendous amount of energy to guide teachers to a place where they can feel comfortable to use tech themselves and with their students.
On the issue of tech for all...I know first hand that it's a struggle in So Cal. As a principal I had to work hard just to keep my computer lab from being dismantled, as like it or not, it was the only place that we could give access to kids and parents to get their hands on tech. In a community with high poverty we opened our lab before, during, after school so that we could give as much access a possible. No 1-to-! happening in my district at the time and still not!
Don't think there is an easy answer, but I salute those around the country doing all they can to share devices and support their students!

Alex Shevrin's picture
Alex Shevrin
Community college teacher, former school leader, Edutopia community facilitator

Laura, looks like that site is having server issues.

In my mind, 1-to-1 isn't a sustainable solution to closing the gap between students who have and those who don't. 1-to-1 is, to me, "giving a man a fish." The more sustainable route would be to support pathways to greater access for all - opening our libraries as learning commons outside school hours, partnering with community resources to increase access, building job skills and personal finance skills so students can gather their own resources. 1-to-1 is for sure a great stepping stone to building skills around using and managing devices, for sure - but not the end solution.

Sign in to comment. Not a member? Register.