Three years ago, 9-year-old Tyshawn Lee was murdered in the Auburn Gresham neighborhood here in Chicago. He was playing in a park when a gunman lured him into a nearby alley and shot him because of his father’s alleged gang ties. In response, Chicago Public Schools provided two weeks of mental health supports at the elementary school Tyshawn attended. They hoped it would be enough help to get the school back to normal.
But what does normal mean when you grow up in a constant state of fear?
Auburn Gresham, located on Chicago’s Southside, had experienced 838 violent crimes in the 365 days before Tyshawn’s murder. Violence is a part of everyday life for children like him. Already in 2018, there have been more than 430 shootings and 95 homicides in Chicago, and we are less than three months into the year. Is two weeks of support enough to help Chicago’s youth cope with the trauma of these experiences?
As a researcher and professor at the University of Chicago, I have researched children’s exposure to violence in urban areas for more than two decades and know the impact it can have on youth. Kids who experience adverse childhood experiences like violence and chronic housing instability can be either hyperactive—unable to contain the anxious energy—or hypoactive—unable to muster the energy to engage. Trauma impacts a child’s brain and cognitive processes, making critical thinking and problem solving more difficult and emotional outbursts more likely.
After hearing about the district’s short-term response and knowing just how much this contradicts what the research says, I realized I needed to help schools be better prepared to provide long-term support for students who experience chronic trauma.
I started by interviewing educators serving schools in high-crime neighborhoods in the city. I learned that they had limited access to mental health supports for students until students’ behavior reached a level that received severe disciplinary action or a special education designation. One of their top requests for professional development was training on how to handle these situations better. Called de-escalation, this approach focuses on helping students who are getting increasingly agitated to calm down before their behavior gets out of hand.
From my outreach, I created the Trauma Responsive Educational Practices (TREP) Project, which helps educators and schools serving children in neighborhoods that have high levels of toxic stress—such as poverty and violence—learn strategies to better support their students. But educators don’t have to partner with TREP to learn some of these approaches. At some point in your teaching career, you’re likely to witness emotional outbursts from your students. Research shows that students with trauma don’t respond to punitive discipline, so it’s important to know strategies that do work.
Preventative de-escalation strategies—based on the Acting Out Cycle—can help. Based on the work of Geoff Colvin and many other researchers, the Acting Out Cycle provides a framework for understanding and responding to challenging student behaviors through different phases: calm, trigger, agitation, acceleration, peak acting out, de-escalation, and recovery.
Students often display several signs of agitation in the early stages of the Acting Out Cycle before a major emotional outburst occurs, such as balling up their fists, withdrawing from classroom interaction, or clenching their jaw. Many educators tend to ignore students’ increasing signs of agitation, hoping they’ll eventually calm down. But when disregarded, these minor behaviors can quickly escalate.
Children that have experienced abuse are much more likely to interpret ambiguous touches—like an accidental hallway bump—as threatening.
Observing what triggers your students’ outbursts will help you become better at using preventative de-escalation strategies to stop them before they start. Loud noises, touch, body language, and anniversaries of tragic events can all be triggers. Children that have experienced abuse, for example, are much more likely to interpret ambiguous touches—like an accidental hallway bump—as threatening. While it’s impossible to identify and prevent all triggers, planning ahead is a critical component of preventative de-escalation.
Start by taking stock of how your classroom and class schedule are organized. Are the desks arranged such that students can easily move up and down the aisles with minimal chance of bumping? Are students swiftly and predictably transitioned into class and engaged with a bell-ringer activity to minimize potential teasing at the start of class?
It’s also important to debrief with students after an emotional outburst to help them identify their triggers in productive ways.
In-the-Moment De-escalation Strategies
But as teachers, you can’t prevent every outburst from happening.
Because it’s difficult for anyone to think clearly and engage in rational conversations when in a heightened emotional state, your two objectives in these situations are to keep students safe and to help the agitated student calm down—not to get that student to apologize or discuss consequences.
Instead, keep your instructions short, clear, and concise, and repeat if necessary. When in an agitated state, traumatized students have a hard time processing complex instructions.
It’s also important to affirm your students’ autonomy by giving them choices. When your students feel respected, their sense of belonging and mood will often improve. You could say, “I see that you’re upset, but it’s not OK to yell at me. You can either go get a drink of water and come back in five minutes or sit in the reading chair and I will check in with you in five minutes.” Be sure to avoid ultimatums like, “You better sit back down or I’ll send you to the office,” but do set limits to let students know what’s required of them to move the conversation forward.
When in an agitated state, traumatized students have a hard time processing complex instructions.
It’s also important to recap what your student says throughout the conversation. After summarizing what they say, ask if they agree with how you interpreted it. This ensures that you’re both on the same page, and it also shows them that you’re listening.
Before returning to learning, give your student more time to calm down on their own. A de-escalation space can do this—a quiet place in class where students can participate in de-stressing activities, like drawing or coloring.
Moving Past Trauma
In moments like these, it’s also important not to forget the rest of your class. As soon as your agitated student is situated, make sure the rest of your students are calm and feel safe too. A quick mindfulness activity can do this. Afterward, acknowledge what happened and give your class a few minutes to process it to help students who may feel anxious.
When the class is brought back to calm, you can debrief with your student who acted out to help them identify what they’re feeling.
It might be difficult for traumatized students to express their emotions, so you will need to guide them with questions like: “Were you feeling angry, sad, hurt, embarrassed, or something else?” or “Did something happen at home or during this class that upset you?” Building student agency is crucial. Ask them to tell you in the future whenever they are feeling upset and need to take a brief break. This can help prevent outbursts.
Working with students who have experienced trauma can be incredibly taxing for teachers, especially when they don’t have the tools to help the students who need it most. Here in Chicago, I’ve found that just because urban educators may know about the trauma their students experience, it doesn’t mean that they know how it impacts them or how best to help them. Proactively preventing and responding to acting out behaviors with support rather than punishment can go a long way in creating schools that are safe for our students.