George Lucas Educational Foundation
Subscribe to RSS

Changing the Education Conversation

Related Tags: Education Trends
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Share

We hear so many negative things about public education in America -- most notably, that our schools are failing. And the reasons often cited involve educator shortcomings, for example, that colleges of education are doing a terrible job of preparing new teachers, or that the students in those colleges are not the high quality individuals we want teaching our children. We also hear that teachers unions care only about adult interests and that as a general rule the professional development teachers receive is a waste of resources.

This rhetoric is impacting the education community. Morale is down; the Metlife Survey of the American Teacher shows that teacher job satisfaction has dropped 15 percentage points in the past two years -- the lowest level in more than two decades. And the percentage of teachers who say they are very or fairly likely to leave the profession has increased by 12 points since 2009, up to 29 percent.

The rhetoric comes despite: 1) the public's general confidence in educators (shown in the 2012 Phi Delta Kappa/Gallup Poll) and, 2) data showing that public education in America is actually improving (for example, the graduation rate is at the highest it has been in three decades, though there is still room for improvement). And the rhetoric comes from a number of corners. Some might be expected, such as those who are interested in the privatization of the education sector. But we also hear this type of language from the media and from those we would hope to consider friends of public education, including politicians, government employees, and others.

Everyone involved in public education recognizes that we need to make major changes to improve outcomes for an increasingly diverse student population. And individuals and organizations representing stakeholders from teachers to state boards of education, school counselors to superintendents and more are working every day to do so.

To support their work, we have to change the way we talk about our public schools and the professionals who work in them. We need to move from an accusatory tone to solution-driven rhetoric and begin talking about public education and the work that educators do in a way that celebrates accomplishments while acknowledging what needs to be improved. Learning First Alliance (LFA) Executive Director Cheryl S. Williams recently offered some concrete examples of how to do that. To quote:

  • Instead of "Our schools are failing," let's try, "Public schools need to get better at meeting the needs of all our students, regardless of socioeconomic class or ethnicity. And, we all need to work on this together to be successful"
  • Instead of "Teacher unions only care about the adults in the system," let's try, "Teacher unions provide a collective voice for classroom practitioners at the local, state and national level and have for some time focused on supporting improved classroom practice. High performing school districts have strong, collaborative relationships with their teacher union"
  • Instead of "The US is losing its leadership place in the world because our students perform poorly on international tests," let's try, "International tests provide valuable data for us as we work on improving our public system, and we should closely examine approaches high performing countries use in their education systems to learn from them. However, standardized test scores are only one data point and should be viewed in the context of cultural differences and student populations"

Next Steps

To lead the effort to change the conversation, this year LFA is launching a messaging campaign to frame the conversation about our public schools in a way that reaffirms the importance of the publicly-funded universal education opportunity and highlights work underway and strategies for working together to implement change.

Work began with a scan of the current landscape (including an examination of public opinion data and past and present messaging campaigns on public education) that revealed common assumptions that the public holds about public education -- for example, that education is influenced primarily by parents, students, and teachers (an assumption that downplays the role of other actors in the education community, such as principals, superintendents and school boards). Based on the scan and what it showed would resonate with the public, a series of messages were developed to drive a new way of talking about public education.

Work is based on the overarching core value statement: Strengthening our public schools is the best way to ensure our children's future success and our country's prosperity.

The key messages that will be used to frame the conversation:

  • All children have the right to a public education that prepares them for college, careers and citizenship
  • Quality public schools build the knowledge and skills young people need to succeed in a global knowledge-based world
  • Communities are stronger and schools are better when we all work together to support public education

This year, LFA (where I am deputy director) will be helping educators get these messages across to national and local politicians, media personalities, business leaders, local community members and more. We must move the conversation beyond pointing fingers to find fault to working together to ensure that all our children have the future they deserve.

Was this useful?

Comments (8) Sign in or register to comment Follow Subscribe to comments via RSS

Todd Finley's picture
Todd Finley
Blogger and Assistant Editor (Contractor)

This is the most important article about the state of teaching that I have read in a long time. Thank you so much!


CAnnD's picture

While I agree with the need to change the rhetoric, the suggested changes won't work as replacements for the short, simplistic phrases that have been so well used by those who can only criticize our education system. Unfortunately, the media and politicians prefer the glib generalizations over the more thoughtful nuanced statements that are offered here.

Lonny's picture

The last paragraph stated the most important information. We all must engage in the road to changing education and how it will look in the future.

Irene's picture

I agree with the statement of changing the way we talk about our public schools and the professionals who work in them. Teamwork is what everything is ALL about.

Derek Pule's picture
Derek Pule
Distance Education Specialist

One thing that's never recognized with American education statistcis is the fact that America takes every student. Other countries are beating us with education statistics because they have more privatized education where only certain students are allowed into their system. America takes all, students in poverish areas and wealthy areas. This is what makes our numbers low. However we can be better, more challenges for students are needed.

Brown's picture
Special Ed

I feel that the public education system can do a better job of meeting the needs of our students. With that being said, why not talk about what we teachers endure. American schools do their best to educate all students no matter their background.

We are sending teachers to battle without the right equipment and support from some administrators. Many classes (schools) do not have updated books or computers. Some computer labs are so old that many times the computers do not work or the software malfunctions. How can we compete in a global world when we are using outdated methods? Administrators are so concerned with state testing scores that, they are penalizing the teachers for not make higher scores Instead, they should help the teachers develop or buy materials that improve scores.

We are teachers, and we do our best, but the burden must be placed on the students and their families. Why do I say this, you may ask? Firstly, students do not have their supplies for classes. I see so many students with name brand clothes on and expensive electronic devices. When did being fashionable out way being prepared for class and learning? I grew up in a large family and we always had our supplies. In those day parents took pride in buying supplies for school and they lasted most of the year. Secondly, we have students failing, but they will not attend tutorials. Thirdly, teachers have meetings and parents do not show up; some do not return phone calls or sign failing reports. Fourthly, we educate these students for a few years, but parents have to educate them for life. Parents must get back to making education a priority. Some students have too many after school activities like soccer, volleyball, and basketball, etc. School work must come before these activities. Parents must support the teachers in educating their children.

The students' support team must make education a priority, demand and enforce that before anything else. Once this is done, then the public education system will become a leader in education again.

Nala's picture

I agree that too often we are quick to make poor remarks about public schools, and students in general. I resent the constant negative comments that our students are not doing well, and are not well equipped. I am convinced that if the curriculum was structured for students to have time to learn the materials and concepts in a reasonable amount of time period, instead of being rushed to learn; they would essentially do much better on the state exams.

Sign in to comment. Not a member? Register.