Facebook
Edutopia on Facebook
Twitter
Edutopia on Twitter
Google+
Edutopia on Google+
Pinterest
Edutopia on Pinterest Follow Me on Pinterest
WHAT WORKS IN EDUCATION The George Lucas Educational Foundation

Boston Teacher Residency: Real-World Training and Cost Incentives Keep Teachers Teaching

Homegrown training for Beantown devotees.
Grace Rubenstein
Former senior producer at Edutopia

AUDIO SLIDE SHOW: The Apprentice: Derek Allen

Produced by Grace Rubenstein, photography by Gregory Cherin

Even in the best teacher-prep programs -- those abundant with real-world practice -- educators in training often learn to be generalists. They typically work in several school settings, learning to teach a range of curricula in preparation for the various assignments they may pursue.

But at the Boston Teacher Residency, every element of preparation is specific to Beantown. Residents learn about the city's history, the Boston Public Schools curriculum, and community traits. They get to know the people and resources in the school district office. A yearlong placement in one of the city's most successful schools then drives those lessons home.

The program, created in 2003 by then superintendent Thomas Payzant and colleagues, aimed to counteract heavy teacher turnover and a shortage of specialists and educators of color.

"They wanted people who were really prepared to do Boston's work," explains program director Jesse Solomon, "people who were committed to Boston, who knew Boston, who were ready to hit the ground running and prepared to stay."

AUDIO SLIDE SHOW: The Apprentice: Nadirah Muhammad

Produced by Grace Rubenstein, photography by Gregory Cherin.

The thirteen-month training, modeled on a medical residency, begins with a summer of University of Massachusetts Boston courses designed by the BPS. During the school year, residents spend one day a week in classes and four days working alongside a mentoring master teacher. Students gradually deepen their involvement and pursue interests beyond their mentors' classrooms, learning from other teachers and experiencing anything from working with full-inclusion groups to coaching a math league. Residents finish with one more month of study.

Upon graduation, they earn a master's degree and a teaching license and are expected to commit to the district for at least three years. The pledge is mutual -- the BPS provides continued mentoring and supports graduates in taking leadership roles.

"Being in a classroom from the first day of school to the last day of school and seeing all those little things that go on during the day was huge in making me a better teacher," says Maria Fenwick, a fourth-grade educator who completed her residency in 2005. "I felt like I had already been a teacher when I entered the classroom my first year."

Credit: Gregory Cherin

Another key innovation of the program is its affordability. Residents receive an $11,100 stipend, plus a $10,000 loan to cover most of tuition. For every year graduates work in the district, one-third of their loan is forgiven.

A consortium of local foundations provided seed money to launch the residency. The district now shoulders 60 percent of the program's $30,000 cost per resident (the figure seems more reasonable considering the $17,000 cost of losing a teacher), covering the rest through grants.

The residency -- already the largest single feeder into the city's schools -- prepares about one-hundred teachers per year. More than 90 percent of graduates are still teaching there -- a testament to the power of real-world preparation.

Grace Rubenstein is a senior producer at Edutopia.

Comments (2)Sign in or register to postSubscribe to comments via RSS

Don Davies's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

As a long-time advocate for the reform of teacher education, I was thrilled to see your report on innovative programs. I had special reactions to two of the cases. First, the Boston Residency program is a great idea being well-executed that provides the Boston public schools with a supply of well-prepared teachers who make a commitment to that system. Second, the new Stanford program which is such a dramatic improvement over the traditional and not very effective teacher preparation program that I went through many years ago at Stanford. Changing teacher education is always a tough challenge as I discovered as the head of the NEA's National Commission on Teacher Education and Professional Standtrds in the 1960's and then as the Associate Commissioner for the Bureau of Education Professional Education Development in the late 1960's and early 1970's. So its a encouraging to see some progress being made in this new era of interest in how teachers are prepared.

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I recieved my teaching certificate through a similar program in Alaska. The program was called Rural Educators Preparation Program, or REPP. It consisted of a 12 month program, being in a school the entire school year, and was focused around the 8 Alaska teaching standards. The program wasn't as 'rigid' as this one seems, which is to say, some teacher interns spent the first half of the school year mostly observing ,while others jumped in, having their own classes beginning day one. It was also geared towards 'second career' candidates, or individuals that already had a bachelor's degree, but no background in education. I admit that it was very tough at times, but you learned very quickly whether or not you really wanted to be a teacher, and I think it definately helped me make the trasition from intern to teacher when I got my first 'real' teaching job.

Sign in and Join the Discussion! Not a member? Register to join the discussion.