Facebook
Edutopia on Facebook
Twitter
Edutopia on Twitter
Google+
Edutopia on Google+
Pinterest
Edutopia on Pinterest Follow Me on Pinterest
WHAT WORKS IN EDUCATION The George Lucas Educational Foundation

Take a Deeper Look at Assessment for Understanding

Performance assessments go beyond traditional tests and serve as an important teaching tool.
By Roberta Furger
VIDEO: Assessment Overview: Beyond Standardized Testing
Every spring, millions of school-age children throughout the United States sharpen their No. 2 pencils and prepare to take a battery of standardized tests. It's a ritual that has come to represent the nation's commitment to high academic standards and school accountability.

Parents use test scores to gauge their children's academic strengths and weaknesses, communities rely on these scores to judge the quality of their teachers and administrators, and state and federal lawmakers use these scores to hold public schools accountable for providing the high-quality education every child deserves.

For many, these standardized tests -- and the countless other smaller tests that are commonplace in today's classrooms -- are what come to mind when they hear the term assessment. We look to the end-of-week spelling test, the end-of-quarter biology exam, even the high school exit exam, to tell us whether our children are developing the skills and learning the material they'll need to succeed both in and out of school.

But tests aren't the only way to gauge a student's knowledge and abilities, just as reciting formulas and memorizing the periodic table is not the only way to learn chemistry. Throughout the country, many educators are going beyond traditional tests and using performance assessments in their K-12 classrooms to gauge what students know and can do.

They're designing projects that require students to apply what they're learning to real-world tasks, like designing a school building or improving the water quality in a nearby pond. And they're giving students the experience, as assessment expert Grant Wiggins says, "of being tested the way historians, mathematicians, museum curators, scientists, and journalists are actually tested in the workplace."

In a classroom setting, performance assessment is an essential companion to project learning. By developing comprehensive rubrics by which to evaluate student performances, teachers ensure that projects are more than just fun and engaging activities. They're true tests of a student's abilities and knowledge, linked to standards, and documented so that everyone -- students, parents, and educators -- understands what is being assessed.

The "performance" can include a wide range of activities and assignments: from research papers that demonstrate how well students can evaluate sources and articulate an opinion to experiments or problems that enable a teacher to gauge a student's ability to apply specific math or science knowledge and skills. Some performance assessments consist of individual projects; others require groups of students to work together toward a common goal.

But whatever the project or problem, well-crafted performance assessments share a common purpose: to give students the chance to show what they know and can do and to provide teachers with the tools to assess these abilities.

Assessment in Action

Assessment is a way of life for the 120 students at New York City's Urban Academy: Every day, in every class, students are encouraged and expected to demonstrate what they're learning. In Constitutional Law, they're required to argue a case before a mock Supreme Court. In geometry, they must apply mathematical concepts to measuring the height and volume of buildings or the distance between South Ferry and Staten Island using the Statue of Liberty as a reference point.

And before they receive their high school diploma, students must complete separate performance assessments (known at the Urban Academy as academic proficiencies) that demonstrate their skills and knowledge in six academic areas: mathematics, social studies, science, creative arts, criticism, and literature.

At New York City's Urban Academy, students show what they know through a series of performance assessments, such as this mock trial in Constitutional Law class.

Credit: Edutopia

"It's a system of assessment, not a single instrument," says Ann Cook, the Urban Academy's codirector. "It's a system based on a number of components, it goes on all year long, and it culminates in certain kinds of tasks that demonstrate what students can do."

These tasks might include writing a play and having it performed in front of the entire school, reading and studying a piece of literature and then being able to engage in a thoughtful conversation about it, or designing and conducting an original science experiment. With each proficiency, students must be prepared to share their work with classmates, teachers, and outside experts, who routinely lend their real-world expertise to the Urban Academy's assessment process.

The Urban Academy and more than 30 other alternative high schools that are part of the New York Performance Standards Consortium have adopted these rigorous performance assessments as an alternative to the Regents Exams, which high school students throughout New York State are required to pass in English, math, history, and science in order to earn a diploma.

Although their procedures may vary, all consortium schools have adopted a system of assessment aligned to state standards and based on a series of well-defined rubrics, so both the student and the teacher clearly understand the criteria on which work is evaluated. The Performance Assessment Review Board, an external group of educators, test experts, researchers, and members of the business and legal communities, monitors the performance-assessment system and evaluates samples of student work.

The consortium, says Linda Darling-Hammond, Charles E. Ducommon Professor of Education at Stanford University, represents an attempt "to develop high-quality performance assessments that can be evaluated in a reliable way." Darling-Hammond, who has worked with the consortium for more than a decade, points to member schools' high college acceptance rate compared with that of all New York City schools (91 percent versus 62 percent) as a testament to their rigorous curriculum and assessment.

Applied Learning

Across the country, at Mountlake Terrace High School, in Mountlake Terrace, Washington, geometry teacher Eeva Reeder began implementing performance-based assessments when she recognized a disturbing pattern among her students: They could pass a test with flying colors but had considerable difficulty transferring knowledge and skills from one unit to the next.

Students in Eeva Reeder's geometry class at Mountlake Terrace High School, near Seattle, spend six weeks applying their geometry skills to the challenge of designing a school for the year 2050.

Credit: Edutopia

Her response to this dilemma was to incorporate projects into her geometry class -- small-scale projects at the end of each unit of study, as well as a longer-term culminating project -- that require students to apply the abstract skills and formulas to real-world settings.

Completing a project, says Reeder, "is the true test of what you know. You can watch a show where Julia Child makes a soufflé, and you can read about soufflé making," she adds, but the real test is "making one yourself."

In Reeder's class, the true test of her students' geometry skills is an architectural challenge. In six weeks, students must design a high school that will meet the needs of students in 2050. Working in small teams, students are required to develop a site plan, create a scale model, prepare cost estimates, and write a formal proposal. They must also present their plan to their classmates and a group of architects who serve as mentors and judges throughout the project.

Assessment of the design projects occurs in several ways. At the beginning of the project, students are given the scoring rubric by which their work will be measured. Each part of the project is evaluated based on quality and accuracy, clarity and presentation, and concept. Reeder also evaluates teamwork (participation, level of involvement, quality of work as a team member) during the course of the project and at the end.

"There are two reasons for assessment," says Reeder. "One is to provide students feedback on the quality of their work and specifically on how they might improve that quality. The other is to assign a score or grade." Scoring is the easy part, she adds, and can be accomplished with the help of what she calls a "reasonably prepared" test.

"But you can't assess a student's deep understanding of a subject and their ability to apply a concept through a traditional paper-and-pencil, crank-out-the-formulas kind of assessment," says Reeder. "It has to be done with a performance assessment."

Assessing Student Growth

One common form of performance assessment is the development of a student portfolio -- a cumulative record of a student's work over time. It's a practice that's been used at the Key Learning Community, a K-12 school in Indianapolis, since the school first opened its doors in the fall of 1987.

Project learning and student presentation of work is an integral part of the Key Learning assessment program. Every semester, students select and research a project that corresponds to a schoolwide theme. These presentations are documented on videotape, and by the time a student completes eighth grade, he or she has a portfolio documenting as many as 25 projects.

In 1999, Key Learning opened its high school (beginning first with a single class of ninth graders), and with the older students came a move toward improved use of new technologies to capture student work. Now, students begin creating Apple iMovies in middle school and continue using the program throughout high school to document and present their work.

Student progress reports (there are no traditional report cards) are based on Howard Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences and Ernest Boyer's theory of human commonalities.

Before earning their high school diploma, Key Learning seniors must document and demonstrate their applied knowledge in what Boyer identified as eight human commonalities. Among these are the shared use of symbols (through the creation of a major multimedia presentation), shared production and consumption (through a project on marketing and economics), and the shared sense of time and space (through a project on the history of Indianapolis or the contributions of an ethnic group to the development of the city).

As the school's eleventh graders gear up for the college application process, Key Learning is investigating ways to create smaller but representative portfolios of student work on CD-ROMs, which will be made available to college admissions departments.

Time Well Spent

Despite their many differences, these three schools share a common commitment to developing a project-rich curriculum supported and influenced by a thoughtful system of assessment. Teachers, students, and parents all understand that the most effective assessment doesn't happen at the end of a unit. It's woven throughout lessons and projects, often so seamlessly as to be indistinguishable from everyday teaching and learning.

Research papers at the Urban Academy go through multiple revisions before students and teachers alike consider them complete.

Credit: Edutopia

Without question, these high-quality performance assessments take time. The typical research paper at the Urban Academy, for example, will go through multiple revisions before the student and his or her teacher consider it complete. With each revision comes a discussion about key issues to be addressed, questions yet to be answered, and concepts that require further development.

A single proficiency might take a semester or even an entire year for a student to complete and might involve hours and hours of discussions with Urban Academy teachers and an outside evaluator. At Mountlake Terrace, Eeva Reeder spends many hours on just the logistics of her six-week-long architecture project, such as organizing field trips to local architects' office and coordinating classroom activities with the mentors' busy work schedules.

"Performance assessments do engage people in work and time. Students have to develop the performances. The teachers have to evaluate them," acknowledges Stanford's Linda Darling-Hammond. But, she emphasizes, "the time is not lost to teaching and learning. The time is teaching and learning, because the actual conduct of the assessment is a learning experience for students as well as teachers. It informs teaching. It gives teachers immediate feedback about what they need to do to meet a student's needs."

And with that immediate feedback comes the ability to intervene, to change course when assessments show that a particular lesson or strategy isn't working for a student, or to offer new challenges for students who've mastered a concept or skill. In this context, says performance-assessment researcher Karen Sheingold, assessment and learning become "two sides of the same coin" rather than separate and distinct activities.

Assessment Versus Accountability

In many U.S. classrooms and schools, assessment practices aren't just about improving teaching and learning for individual students. They're inextricably bound to the public's demand for greater accountability. All 50 states administer annual assessments to their students, the results of which can determine whether a student is promoted or retained and whether teachers get bonuses or a school gets reconstituted.

Although multiple choice and short-answer tests are still the norm, states are gradually incorporating performance-based assessments into their standardized tests.

Credit: Edutopia

These tests, because of their high stakes, have an incredible influence on classroom practices. For example, nearly 70 percent of the teachers responding to a 2000 Education Week survey on standards and accountability said that state assessments were "forcing them to concentrate too much on what's tested, to the detriment of other important areas of learning." The teachers reported dropping longer units with rich assessment components in favor of more traditional lessons that reflected the type of material and format common in most state assessments.

Few would argue with the need, as Hugh Price, president of the National Urban League, says, to "know whether or not children are learning, and whether they're performing on grade level or better or way below." But when the stakes are too high, this laudable goal gets distorted. Teachers begin teaching to the test to raise scores, often at the expense of more meaningful learning activities. And when the tests are too narrow a measure or aren't properly aligned to standards, they provide little concrete information teachers and schools can use to improve teaching and learning for individual students.

Although most states continue to use multiple-choice and short-answer items on their standardized tests, a handful of states have incorporated additional measures into their annual assessments. The Maryland School Performance Assessment Program for example, is frequently commended for the thoughtful way in which it calls on students to demonstrate multiple abilities in answering a single question or problem. (See Bruce Alberts's Edutopia.org article "Appropriate Assessments for Reinvigorating Science Education.")

In addition, Kentucky and Vermont have incorporated portfolios into their statewide assessments of student achievement -- another effort to offer a broader picture of student achievement, and the now-defunct Massachusetts Reform Review Commission convened representatives from various stakeholder groups to devise a strategy for expanding the Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System to make it fairer and more comprehensive.

These additions are important and necessary, says Chris Dede, a professor of education at Harvard University, in order to really understand what students know and can do. "The current reform movement is based on first-generation standards and first-generation assessments for accountability," says Dede. "And while standards and accountability are good," he adds, "the first generation is flawed. Instead of multiple indicators of what students know, we end up with a single test score that somehow is supposed to capture everything that's inside of a student's head."

Dede (who is also a member of The George Lucas Educational Foundation's National Advisory Council) likens state assessments to an annual visit to the doctor and suggests that we need more, not less, information to gauge a student's knowledge and abilities.

"When I go to a doctor for a physical, it's an indicator of overall wellness," he says. "I don't just want to know about my blood pressure. I want to know about my cholesterol level and a variety of other indicators. Somebody's educational well-being is more complicated than their physical health."In our second generation's standards, we need deeper focus on fewer skills that are central to the 21st century," he adds. "And in our second-generation assessments, we need broader measures, multiple measures that look at the different kinds of things that students have learned and have mastered."

Roberta Furger is a contributing writer for Edutopia.

Comments (123)Sign in or register to postSubscribe to comments via RSS

B Stone's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I am a student getting ready to have a classroom of my own this next school year. I also work as an instructional assistant in a special education classroom. There is so much focus on testing and getting students working to a level (standard) so that they can show that they are proficient in a particular content area. Passing a test does not show a whole lot about who the child is and what they know. This is especially apparent with children who have special needs or disabilities. It is difficult for students in my class to show what they really know through test taking. Most of them do have accommodations during testing like having a reader or getting extra time but this still does not help these students pass the test or show what they do know. I love the idea of performance based testing and allowing the students opportunities to apply what they have learned and their skills to complete projects and solve problems. We want students to be able to think critically and apply themselves. This takes practice and why not be able to practice in school.

It seems like students involved in sports or music learn how to apply their learning through drills, training and scrimmaging/rehearsals. The performance or test is the game or concert. I think the same method should be used in the classroom. Personally even though is has been a long time since my high school days, I feel the things I learned through sports were more helpful to me than what I learned in the classroom; perseverance, commitment, sacrifice, loyalty, dedication, character, determination etc. I think students who are allowed to demonstrate their learning through performance style assessments will gain valuable experiences that can be used in other areas of their lives.

ET's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I agree with you. I have "seen" this diservice "first hand!" Standardized testing leads to the following year of even more local assessing in order to see if the students are meeting their benchmarks> I agree that there has to be a standard, but there's so much "useless spending" for programs and "specialists" that are supposed to cure the problem, which is what is happening @ our school district. They are not supposed to teach. A big problem is standardized testing and the wasteful spending.

Ellen Maddin's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

As a curriculum and instruction consultant in a county office of education (Hamilton County Educational Service Center, Cincinnati, Ohio), I often encounter educators who eschew performance assessment in favor of more traditional measures of learning (i.e., tests and quizzes). A few years ago, I came across a research study conducted by the University of Chicago that convinces even the most skeptical that their students will not only learn more but will be BETTER prepared for high stakes tests if they focus on challenging projects and tasks rather than test prep.

The study--titled Authentic Intellectual Work and Standardized Tests: Conflict or Coexistence?-- examines Chicago teachers' assignments in mathematics and writing in grades three, six, and eight. Results indicated that students who received assignments requiring more challenging intellectual work also achieved greater than average gains on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills in reading and mathematics, and demonstrated higher performance in reading, mathematics, and writing on the Illinois Goals Assessment Program.

We can't afford to be paralyzed by the fear of next spring's test scores. Our kids deserve better than that! You can read a summary of the study--or download the entire report by going to http://ccsr.uchicago.edu/content/publications.php?pub_id=38.

Suzanne Hayden's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I enjoyed reading this article, and I think that student portfolios measure the more important things that the students learned. I feel pressure from the community and from my administrators about state test scores, and it is definitely wearing teachers down. I keep student portfolios in my classroom, and I love to hand them back at the end of the year so they can see their improvements. It is so much better than the students just looking at state test scores that they don't know how to read. I live for that look that they give me when they see their accomplishments first hand.

John Q.'s picture
Anonymous (not verified)

We cannot blame who wrote the NCLB and Bush for their only objective is to elevate our academic standing. Yes, there are several optimistic points about NCLB. Teachers and students were now concern with their academic results. And these assessments are helpful to gauge the capabilities of the students. Because American education is not in its greatest shape that such action must be firmly implemented all over the country. But let us not limit our way of learning inside the classrooms. Every person has their own level of ability to learn and way on how to learn their lesson easily. We must take a deeper look on the real situation of the students and teachers and the most efficient way to solve such difficulty. The level of knowledge is not only measured through standardized tests or books but on how the student will learn the true meaning of life. Incentives like what President Obama offered will not determine how good or terrible a teacher or a student. What is important is that something needs to be done to improve American education.

R. Hammond's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I read your article and I agree with the option of having students to complete projects to demonstrate learning by applying knowledge. If students were only required to demonstrate their knowledge through projects the rest of their lives than we could say we are assessing them correctly. Our society still requires it's members to be able to communicate through verbal expression and comprehension of information received. It is almost impossible to give all students equal opportunity to demonstrate their learning if written assessment is excluded. Projects may be effective with some students but others may excel through standardize testing. Social and emotional learning plays a big role in assessment and weighs heavy on project based learning. If our society continues to flounder in it's attempt to please everyone concerning assessment, than our students will suffer and ultimately our society will "dummie down".

AmandaB's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I feel this is very applicable to what I am studying in my college course.

Donna Burk's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Why does it have to be standardized test or performance based? Why can't we incorporate both? I agree with the article that we need performance base projects as a means to show students' understanding of learning. But what about the student ability to read and write? I can see how low achieving students can greatly benefit from performance based assessments, but they should not be excluded from knowing how to read and write. Performance base assessments at the level the article spoke about, requires strong community involvement. What about areas that don't have strong community involvement? I really like the way the performance based schools are preparing their students for the real world of work, I just don't think that one shoe fits all.

GraylingM's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

Unfortunately (and realistically), the harsh reality that most schools face in this financially driven, high-stakes shell game entitled "No Child Left
Behind" is that standardized tests are the driving force behind education. Unlike focusing on raising standardized test scores, Project-based learning not only provides the "What?", but demonstrates the "How?" and "Why?" of many topics. Considering Gardner's theory of multiple intelligences, one must see that students are not all alike and perform well in different areas. Should we not consider the whole of the student's education (as a lifelong learner) as opposed to their ability to memorize and regurgitate facts on command? This truly is how I believe that many in the inner-city school districts begin to fail our children...

George Bracey's picture
Anonymous (not verified)

I am currently a 10th grade Geometry teacher in the State of Michigan. Although I throughly enjoyed the article, I believe that our student's educational needs lie with both performance assessments, and standardized testing. Standardized tests such as the "ACT" are being observed and considered more than ever by college entrance boards. The reason this is true, is because a test like the "ACT" is given in the exact same format accross the entire country. Many believe that it measures the skill level of all students, despite ethnic background or social differences. However, there is nothing like a hands-on project to bring out the best in many different types of learners. I also believe that the skills learned during a project can become transferable to the skills needed during many standardized test. As our students find themselves more immersed into a global society, they may find that both skill sets are required for success. Perhaps what we need to do as educators, is to find a way to include both types of assessments within our curriculums.

Discussion ACT State Profile Reports: College Readiness

Last comment 2 days 23 hours ago in College Readiness

Discussion Sharing Data with Students: Turning "Data-Driven" on its Head

Last comment 5 days 23 hours ago in Assessment

blog A Defense of Deeper Learning: Watch What's Working, Part 5

Last comment 2 weeks 1 day ago in Assessment

Discussion Extra Credit: Grade-Grubbing or Acts-of-Desperation?

Last comment 2 days 30 min ago in Assessment

Discussion Mind the Gap

Last comment 1 week 6 days ago in Common Core

Sign in and Join the Discussion! Not a member? Register to join the discussion.