Redefining Smart: Multiple Intelligences | Edutopia
Edutopia on Facebook
Edutopia on Twitter
Edutopia on Google+
Edutopia on Pinterest Follow Me on Pinterest
WHAT WORKS IN EDUCATION The George Lucas Educational Foundation

Redefining Smart: Multiple Intelligences

Edutopia reports on the resurgent relevance of Howard Gardner's ground-breaking theory, which changed the game for students and teachers.
By Edutopia
Edutopia Team
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Share
Credit: iStockphoto

Editor's Note (2013): There is no scientific evidence, as of yet, that shows that people have specific, fixed learning styles or discrete intelligences, nor that students benefit when teachers target instruction to a specific learning style or intelligence. However, providing students with multiple ways to learn content has been shown to improve student learning (Hattie, 2011). Read more about the research on multiple intelligences and learning styles.

In his landmark book Frames of Mind: The Theory Of Multiple Intelligences, published in 1983, Harvard University education professor Howard Gardner unveiled a theory of multiple intelligences that famously rejected the traditional and long-held view that aptitude consists solely of the ability to reason and understand complex ideas.

Instead, he identified seven separate human capacities: musical, verbal, physical, interpersonal, visual, logical, and intrapersonal. And not all of them, including the category he added years later -- naturalistic -- could be easily evaluated by the standard measuring stick of the time: the IQ test.

Psychologists, unimpressed with Gardner's mold breaking, mostly looked the other way. Teachers, on the other hand, were electrified. The book supported what educators had known for a long time: Kids in their classrooms possess natural aptitudes for music, sports, emotional understanding -- strengths that cannot be identified in traditional tests. Gardner had given voice to their experience. Boston University education professor Scott Seider describes the reaction as a "grassroots uprising" of educators at all levels who embraced multiple intelligences (MI) theory "with a genuine passion."

In the articles that follow, we cast our light on places where the passion awakened by Gardner burns brightest today -- in schoolwide curricula, in the hearts and minds of individual teachers, in the continuing research on intelligences, and, as ever, in the evolving philosophy of Gardner himself. Like so many education reforms, the theory of multiple intelligences still is the subject of vociferous and ever-changing debate. Such is the bumpy path to change.

In keeping with our mission to illuminate what works in public education, we look at the specific ways MI enriches the experience of students and advances the goals of their teachers. Be sure to look for more of our MI coverage here on, which includes a quick personal-assessment test that could help you discover a sense of your own native MI brilliance.

Comments (67)Sign in or register to postSubscribe to comments via RSS

Tractatus's picture

Before positing a link inviting readers to take "a quick personal-assessment test that could help you discover a sense of your own native MI brilliance" that then takes them to a learning styles (LS) assessment, you might want to read Howard Gardner's own words about how MI and LS should be seen as distinct (see Reflections on Multiple Intelligences: Myths and Messages. Phi Delta Kappan, v77 n3 p200-03,206-09 Nov 1995).

Part of why I clicked on the "native MI brilliance" link relates to what I remember of Gardner's ideas about assessment: Surely one wouldn't be able to characterize, say, kinesthetic intelligence with an on-line, text-heavy, multiple choice, assessment?!?

I guess the good news is that you didn't do this (although similar issues might be raised relative to assessing LS) ... but I hope your readers might understand that what is outlined above betrays a very substantive level of confusion regarding the core claims of MI and, quite possibly, LS as well. At the very least, the claims of MI theory are generally not considered the same as the claims of LS theories.

Finally, yes many teachers find MI or LS compelling. Just as true, however, is the fact that many more teachers don't. The big difference between these groups (I say as someone who taught for many years) is that the skeptics regarding learning styles in particular have the overwhelming support of every major research group that has ever looked into the core issues and/or the empirical claims. So I guess I'm a little perplexed that the wisdom of these 'other' classroom educators seems never to be represented as, perhaps, pointing toward well-founded concerns about the use of MI or LS to structure actual educational practice in schools. Of course children are different. But this fact, in and of itself, is not proof that either MI or LS represent a credible, convincing or responsible characterization of, or response to, this diversity.

Petrillo Pat's picture

Thanks for such great info, it gave me insights and I think as well for everyone.

Mr. Pat Petrillo
MMA Pound for Pound

Tracy Patton's picture
Tracy Patton
parent of 2 elementary kids, PTA chair, and community volunteer

Jane M. Healy, Ph.D., is presenting a workshop for educators and parents in Bellevue on May 15, 2010, on effective strategies for working with "different learners"--children who are gifted, fall somewhere on the autism spectrum, have dyslexia, ADHD, or face some other learning challenge. She's a great speaker and presents the latest research in compelling, practical ways. Check out

Matt's picture

Just wondering how much time people have invested in understanding the reliability of the research behind multiple intelligences. Most people in the cognitive neuroscience fields are highly skeptical. These "multiple" intelligences are all correlated with each other, bolstering support for the often-demonized concept of "g" general intelligence. While it is convenient and comforting to theorize about multiple intelligences, the more appropriate concept might be to consider multiple "interests", "attractions" or "patterns".

Let's just be careful not to accept something wholesale simply because it feels right. We have science for a reason. More than 25 years after the theory was proposed by Gardner, it is still not well-supported by science.

yvonne f fine's picture
yvonne f fine
LEFTY.grand mom and 4 grands so far

amazing hope very close the way i was processed close to real me

Christine Termini Passarella's picture
Christine Termini Passarella
Founder of The Kids for Coltrane Project in Education

I am grateful to Dr. Gardner for his Theory of Multiple Intelligences. In addition, his brilliant team at Harvard's Project Zero is doing transformative, generative and vital work. I have based my Kids for Coltrane Project in Education on his theory and other research coming out of Project Zero. Please view their web site to read more about the Project Zero research and researchers.

I have had amazing experiences attending professional development institutes at Harvard. Learning directly from the PZ team is "electrifying" for sure! My work with my students is the focus of the last chapter of Nat Hentoff's latest book entitled "At the Jazz Band Ball: Sixty Years on the Scene". Mr. Hentoff told me it gives him hope for the future. The PZ research gives me hope for the future. Thank you Howard Gardner, Dave Perkins, Steve Seidel, Shari Tishman, Veronica Boix Mansilla, Lois Hetland, Ellen Winner, Tina Blythe, and all of the other researchers at PZ. I will leave you with a quote and wish you all a productive and uplifting new school year. "Do not then train youths to learning by force and harshness, but direct them to it by what amused their minds so that you may be better able to discover with accuracy the peculiar bent of the genius of each." ~ Plato

Don Hagelberg's picture
Don Hagelberg
Motivational Interviewing and Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligences

Motivational Interviewing is a technique which came out of the field of Addiction Treatment. The basic insight of this technique is to find out what the reasons a client has to get sober and to gently re-enforce them in order to increase the possibilities of positive treatment outcome. It proceeds from the truth that the client is the best if only person to know why s/he should get into treatment or become clean and sober.

Multiple Intelligences as expressed by Doctor Howard Gardner expands the stifling definitions of intelligence as being only Word-Intelligence and Math-Intelligence. While the exact number of intelligences is still being researched, eight intelligences have seemed to be verified. The duel functions of an Intelligence could be defined as being both a mode of instruction as well as a way of knowing.

If we were to marry these two insights, we could then: 1) find out the set of reasons which motivates a student and 2) find out the intelligence cluster by which a student learns and:
Use the highest scoring intelligence or cluster of intelligences as ways of teaching less than interesting intelligence subject material enforced by those motivations which were uncovered in the first paragraph.

What have we done by marrying these two insights? We have given the teacher leverage to teach by knowing and gently enforcing the motives which move the individual student as well as being able to select and use a way of instruction where by material of little or no interest can be more effectively transmitted to the individual student.

And if the only thing you think is "That is grand for the Alcoholic/Addict, but what does it have to do with my sixth grade?"
Then you have been skewed by my mention of alcoholism and addiction.
You now have my permission to apply these two insights to whatever grade with which you are involved.

Nancy Jacobs's picture
Nancy Jacobs
ELL teacher for grades 7-12 at Norfolk, NE.

[quote]As an artist I have often been frustrated with the over reliance our society has on its one mode of learning. As an art teacher I am often surprised to hear other teachers lament that they "cannot draw a straight line." If I were to declare to them that I cannot write a complete sentence, or read a book, I would be looked at as if I was crazy. I think everyone should be able to express themselves visually in a way similar to our ingrained views of literacy. Everyone should be able, for instance to draw a realistic picture of themselves while looking in a mirror. This is a basic art skill, to represent what you see and feel on paper with a pencil. But then again I could no more create a competent piece of music without first spending a year leaning music. We have a very long way to go before society is willing to embrace the kind of intellectual diversity teachers see every day as represented by Gardner's MI.[/quote]

Craig, I agree with you. My strengths have always been interpersonal and verbal. I make my living translating and interpreting and teaching Spanish and English.

But, art stopped after grade school. On Edutopia's quiz I had a ZERO on visual/spatial. Maybe I should know basic art skills and logic problems and geometry, etc. But I don't see how it would have helped me exactly. I'd be miserable learning those things and would rather read a book. I also hated PE.

Jolene Gray's picture

I took the test three times to compare my results, and was surprised how accurate the results were. I have recently started college and this assesment was one of our class assignments. I will be using the suggested learning techniques through out the course to enhance my learning experience.

rebekah's picture
middle school

i to took the quiz i found it very interesting and will use these tools to further my education

Sign in to comment. Not a member? Register.