Technology Combined with Good Teaching Leads to Success
By Heather Wolpert-Gawron
3/17/09Interactive whiteboards are the future of educational strategies, and without proper adoption of these and other technology tools, teachers are doomed to become dinosaurs in their practices.
Who says so? Educational research and practice expert Robert Marzano.
As he spoke at the CUE (Computer Using Educators) conference earlier this month, he warned educators, however, that although there are "no silver bullets," there are "silver BBs," and a teacher must decide which combination of silver BBs is best for his or her classroom.
But, unquestionably, the use of the interactive whiteboard and its voter-response technology is a true breakthrough in education.
The Research
Marzano recently divided 85 educators into two groups: One taught a lesson to students using interactive whiteboards and the other taught the same lesson using standard, more traditional tools. His data was undeniable:
- Of those classrooms employing the boards and using the voting technology, there was an immediate increase of 17 percent in scores.
- He also found that if a teacher had been given 20-30 months to hone his or her skills, there was an average 20 percentile gain.
- The sweet spot, he says -- the perfect storm of student achievement, according to his findings -- was when a teacher was trained to use the technology, had used it for two years, and did so 75 percent of the time. That profile shows a whopping 29 percentile gain in scores.
But he warns that there is such a thing as too much technology. Marzano told the audience that beyond this sweet spot, dragons await in the form of diminishing returns in improved student scores, thus proving, he adds, that you clearly "can't take the human being out of teaching."
A Balance Is Best
To get the most out of the interactive whiteboard, a school district can't just give it to a teacher, and can't just give it to any teacher. The district has to train that teacher. And Marzano was quick to point out that weaker teachers require professional development in the use of both interactive whiteboards and effective teaching. Success comes in finding that sweet spot and using it properly. He emphasizes that, statistically, this successful strategy only works if
- there is clear focus on content, not just using bells and whistles -- the technology proves merely distracting otherwise.
- the voting component is in place, keeping track of students who are getting it and those who aren't.
- this student feedback is used formatively to help guide future instruction.
Having Marzano carrying the technology standard is exciting. It proves not only the legitimacy of these strategies but also that all of us, even the best educational practitioners, can evolve in their own theories.
It is also comforting to have such a godfather of educational practice reminding those before him in the trenches that, despite the negative press about education, statistics continue to prove that "if you give magic BBs to teachers who want to hone their craft, great things can happen."


Engage with content
The classroom voting thing I get. Marzano loves assessment and data about student learning, but what does that have to do with an interactive white board?
That can be done with a projector and a screen that isn't interactive.
KS
Sera que vai ser bom
necessario verificar:)
Free copy of RegDefense!
Hi Folks,
I just wanted to share this registry cleaner (RegDefense) with everyone in this forum/website since RegDefense is a free program to download and saves you lots of headache, makes your computer run way faster and smother.
You can download it for free at: http://reviewregdefense.com
Enjoy RegDefense.
We live in an era where students are using the computer before pre-school. Our students are technologically savvy and they want to be actively involved with technology and their learning. The current trend is to use Interactive White Boards and teachers need to be trained to effectively incorporate this technology into their lessons. How many teachers will use this technology if they do not recieve the proper training? Is a one day workshop enough to provide them with the tools and knowledge to intergrate this technology into their lessons and have them feel comfortable using it? I think many teachers that have this technology in their classroom and are not technology savvy themselves will refrain from its implementation because lack of training. Where does that leave our students?
If we truly want to engage our students and give them the tools to succeed in our society, we have to change the way we teach them. Before we can meet our students needs, we have to look at ourselves and change the way we teach. Teachers today can not teach as they did twenty years ago, but must embrace technology and fully integrate it into the classroom. Just because some teachers are not comfortable learning and using technology is no reason why our students should fall behind those that have teachers that embrace it. School systems should provide more than a one day training to help teachers feel comfortable implementing new tecnology into their classrooms. In addition, implementing technology is not enough to serve our students but we must create opportunities to allow students to learn things in new ways using technology so they can take ownership over their learning. Students must make connections to their learning in order for it to become meaningful to them.
Teachers have to be responsible for their own development
Yes, districts need to provide more training and time to practice, but at the end of the day, the teacher has to roll up his/her sleeves and figure it out. I hope you all would expect the same of your students? You get an overview, some guided practice, and then you are set free to explore and make meaning on your own. If you care and/or are interested, magic will happen. If you get stuck, your commitment will help find solutions. I'd like to see some research on teachers who refuse or are hesitant to integrate technology into the classroom to see how many other research-based methods are missing...