WHAT WORKS IN EDUCATION The George Lucas Educational Foundation

Design Thinking: Lessons for the Classroom

Comments (32)

Comment RSS

Design Thinking for Educators

Was this helpful?
+1

Hello all...this is a great article. I wanted to share a resource that was created between IDEO and Riverdale Country School around this idea of design thinking in education.

www.designthinkingforeducators.com

Great idea, great presentation

Was this helpful?
0

Hi, Ewan!

Loved the TEDx talk. Your approach to the problem of integrating more design thinking into K-12 schools is intriguing. I'm very interested to hear how it plays out for you here in the USA. The non-profit I co-founded, The Design-Ed Coalition, is going to have the challenge of taking the multitude of theories in K-12 Design Education and coalescing them into workable solutions - not an easy thing to do without a national education plan, as America lacks. Where we hope our strength as a group will be is to take ALL of the methods of using design as a teaching tool and presenting them to educators, who can then pick what works best for them, their school district and their students. I'd love to hear more from you!

Design Learning and Research

Re: Ewan's post regarding student-generated discovery

Was this helpful?
0

Ewan, I'm excited to hear about your book! When will it be published? I'll also checkout your TEDxLondon talk.

You're comments on teacher-centered instruction rather than student-centered is spot on. I've recently discovered a very simple, but powerful chart in a 2011 ASCD publication: "Where Great Teaching Begins: Planning for Student Thinking and Learning" by Anne R. Reeves. http://www.ascd.org/Publications/Books/111023-overview.aspx

Check out Figure 1.1. Contrasting Views of Instructional Design in this link: http://www.ascd.org/publications/books/111023/chapters/Instructional-Design@-Who-and-What-Is-It-For¢.aspx

Design Learning and Research

Re: John's post on student-centered problem solving

Was this helpful?
0

John, I couldn't agree more, similar is true of project-based learning. Each instructional approach can be designed/implemented well, students learn, resulting effective performance... or simply a waste of time. As you so correctly point out, without the capacity to identify, develop, and implement effective objectives - there is no learning, more just going through the process sans deep cognitive engagement, resulting in ineffective outcomes.

time management

Was this helpful?
0

In order for teachers to be able to do this effectively they need to have their time management and organization systems down. If you want to do this collaboratively, interdisciplinary approach you need to have the patience and resources to commit. Then, this can be extremely powerful.

Emeritus Faculty in the School of Engineering / University of Connecticut

Absolutely!

Was this helpful?
0

I might put it slightly differently: "You need to identify the problem to be solved first. It is as important as any other component of problem solving." If the objective is provided OR if the individual or the team jumps at the first thing that comes to mind, at best, the wrong problem will be addressed. At worst, as you note in the TED Talk, the Learners have missed a key part skills development.

What I seek to do in my efforts to promote effective learning and effective problem solving is to provide a context for the student effort without ever providing the defining or leading question. For example, I'd suggest the student team develop a proposal in sustainable energy rather than even give them a list of processes that contribute to the sustainable energy effort. The reason for the announcement on sustainable energy is that it relates to the class involved and yet is do broad that (a) I'm still asking for effort at the objective step and (b) there is no way I can do justice to the topic through homework or class discussions AND (c) it is a currently relevant topic that is being discussed in the media.

You are absolutely correct in noting how much students expect from faculty; while they don't say it directly, their wish or even expectation is "Tell us what we need to know or do and we'll do it ..." They absolutely need to be able to identify / develop the objective; it will determine their worth probably as much (or more) than any subsequent solution.

An example from my academic career: When facilitating a Fluid Mechanics course, I asked teams to investigate and document the importance a fluid (gas or liquid remember) played in a situation they could encounter. That's all I gave them. A few days later, one team (college Juniors!) came to my office. They told me they couldn't think of any situation they could encounter that involved a fluid! After successfully resisting my inclination to laugh at that point, I told them that I refused to accept that statement; I went on to tell them, I'd entertain questions and concerns once they had more than one situation of interest (as all teams were instructed to develop).

Without the ability to develop objectives, any person or group becomes nothing more than a hired hand. I don't care what the career field is, there are very few opportunities for such people - certainly no satisfying and rewarding options ...

curriculum and projects learning centers

A Wikispace Arts and Education Adventure...

Was this helpful?
0

Dear Designers of Education and Education Designers etc.

This is my wikispace for Arts and Education Adventure:
http://artsandeducationadventure.wikispaces.com/

There are 150 pages of Arts Fun and student-engaging activities K-12...
It is a Play-in-Progress looking for Collaborators in Classrooms and Publishing...

"If it ain't fun I won't do it."

"Caretaker of Wonder", Teacher/Learner:
Allen Berg

CEO of NoTosh learning | technology | design thinking

It's time we put less emphasis on problem solving...

Was this helpful?
+2

and concentrated more on the beginning of the design thinking process - FINDING good problems to start with. My challenge to many of the design thinking movements in education thus far is two-fold (and are discussed in a forthcoming book):

1. Many have a focus on design education (putting the process, in the minds of administrators, firmly within a distinct subject area rather than as a whole-school, whole new way of learning).
2. Nearly every problem-solving based approach I've seen has revolved around problems created by teachers. This doesn't engage learners half as much than when they seek the problems they wish to solve. It's a lot harder to teach this way, but a lot more beneficial in the long run.

I've summed them up in an 8 minute TEDxLondon talk, from last year:
http://edu.blogs.com/edublogs/2011/11/tedxlondon-the-problem-finders-vid...

Design Learning and Research

NAEA Conference

Was this helpful?
0

Great! I'll be there for the duration, looking forward to John's talk as well. Perhaps there will be time for a cup of tea with Robin?

Design Learning and Research

Re: Garreth's Post

Was this helpful?
0

Garreth, I've explored Dr. Burnette's website a bit. Love the constructive approach to teaching and learning. In regards to Gardner's Multiple Intelligences, so much more has been discovered over the past 15 years pertaining to how we take in, process, and retain information. An exciting time that we live!

If it okay with you, I'd like to share your Spiral Q Puppet Theater project with IDSA regarding including a description within the Teaching Design to K12 page: http://www.idsa.org/teaching-design-k-12

Looking forward to your thoughts!