Facebook
Edutopia on Facebook
Twitter
Edutopia on Twitter
Google+
Edutopia on Google+
Pinterest
Edutopia on Pinterest Follow Me on Pinterest
WHAT WORKS IN EDUCATION The George Lucas Educational Foundation
Subscribe to RSS

Common Core Big Idea 5: Consider Meaningful Assessment

Jay McTighe

education author and consultant

Editor's note: This is the fifth post in a five-part series which takes a look at five big ideas for implementation of the Common Core State Standards, authored by Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins.

A prevalent misconception about standards in general is that they simply specify learning goals to be achieved. A more complete and accurate conception, in line with the colloquial meaning of the term, recognizes that standards also refer to the desired qualities of student work and the degree of rigor that must be assessed and achieved.

Think about what we mean when we talk about “high standards” in athletics, music or business: we refer to the quality of outcomes, not the inputs. We ask if work is up to standard, not whether we “covered” such standards as teachers. In this sense, the standards are at their core a set of criteria for building and testing local assessment. They tell where we must look and what we must look for to determine if student work is up to standard. Such information is crucial to guide local assessments and insure that these are validly anchored against national standards.

Ironically (and unfortunately), this important point is not made in the main body of the ELA Common Core Standards but in Appendix B and C. These Appendices are arguably the most important sections of the ELA Standards because there the authors describe the degree of text difficulty that students must be able to handle, the features that need to be evident in student writing, and the kinds of performance tasks that will provide the needed evidence. Accompanying samples of scored work illustrate the qualities of performance that must be attained to meet the Standards.

This performance-based conception of standards lies at the heart of what is needed to translate the Common Core into a robust curriculum and assessment system. The curriculum and related instruction must be designed backward from an analysis of standards-based assessments; i.e., worthy performance tasks anchored by rigorous rubrics and annotated work samples. We predict that the alternative -- a curriculum mapped in a typical scope and sequence based on grade-level content specifications -- will encourage a curriculum of disconnected “coverage” and make it more likely that people will simply retrofit the new language to the old way of doing business.

Thus, our proposal reflects the essence of backward design: Conceptualize and construct the curriculum back from sophisticated “cornerstone” tasks, reflecting the performances that the Common Core Standards demand of graduates. Indeed, the whole point of Anchor Standards in ELA and the Practices in Mathematics is to establish the genres of performance (e.g., argumentation in writing and speaking, and solving problems set in real-world contexts) that must recur across the grades in order to develop the capacities needed for success in higher education and the workplace.

Our recommendation to construct curriculum around assessments may lead to a related misunderstanding; i.e., that we need to assess each grade-level Standard in isolation, one by one. We think that this view is due in part to the layout of grade-level Standards and to the look and feel of traditional standardized tests, in which very discrete objectives are the subject of most test items. This confuses means and ends; it conflates the “drill” with the “game.” The authors of the Common Core Standards wisely anticipated this misconception and they caution against it: “While the Standards delineate specific expectations in reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language, each standard need not be a separate focus for instruction and assessment. Often, several standards can be addressed by a single rich task. (ELA Standards, p. 5).”

In sum, moving from standards to curriculum requires careful reading and thoughtful interpretation to avoid the predictable misunderstandings noted above, while building the curriculum backward from worthy tasks offers the pathway to the performances envisioned by the Common Core.

From Common Core Standards to Curriculum Series: Five Big Ideas
In this series, authors Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins explore five big ideas about the Common Core State Standards and their translation into a curriculum. The goal of this series is to clear up misunderstandings and offer recommendations for designing a coherent curriculum and assessment system for realizing the standards' promise.

Jay McTighe

education author and consultant
Related Tags:
In This Series
In this series, authors Jay McTighe and Grant Wiggins explore five big ideas about the Common Core State Standards and their translation into a curriculum. The goal of this series is to clear up misunderstandings and offer recommendations for designing a coherent curriculum and assessment system for realizing the standards' promise.

Comments (3)Sign in or register to postSubscribe to comments via RSS

Kim M's picture
Kim M
K-5 Visual Art Teacher

Thanks you for share your view on the commen core and creating assessment in these area. Do you have any views on assessments in the area of art?

Wowzers's picture
Wowzers
Wowzers offers online Game-based Math curriculum for Grades 3-8

Totally agree, we have to set high standards to be able to reach higher-level understanding and thought. This includes using assessments that actually evaluate 'deeper understanding'.

Check out this blog post to see what a recent study had to say on PARCC and Smarter Balanced's ability to assess 'deeper understanding' - http://blog.wowzers.com/bid/270791/Do-PARCC-and-Smarter-Balanced-truly-a...

Randy Barron's picture
Randy Barron
Teaching Artist, Choreographer, and Dancer

This is great, foundational material, Jay. Thank you for putting it so clearly and concisely. As I work with teachers in the realm of arts integration, I make the point that constructivist, integrated strategies are completely consistent with the Common Core philosophy. And that makes performance assessment / authentic assessment step front and center, relegating bubble tests to the bottom of the assessment heap. At long last.

blog The Myth of Having Summers Off

Last comment 14 hours 37 min ago in Teacher Leadership

blog Mastering the Teaching Game

Last comment 17 hours 16 min ago in Teaching Strategies

blog Teachers and Parents: Join the Fight for a Fair and Open Internet

Last comment 4 days 16 hours ago in Technology Integration

blog Top 12 Summer Tips for Top Teachers

Last comment 2 days 10 hours ago in Professional Development

blog 12 Nuggets of 21st-Century Learning

Last comment 3 weeks 2 days ago in Education Trends

Sign in and Join the Discussion! Not a member? Register to join the discussion.