Confronting the Crisis in Teacher Training

Innovative schools of education invent better ways to prep educators for the classroom.

Innovative schools of education invent better ways to prep educators for the classroom.
Illustration of a sculptor creating a teacher
Credit: Thomas Reis

Melissa Zipper needs less than a second to tally the value of her teacher-preparation experience: "Nothing."

Looking back on the nine-month master's degree program, she elaborates, "I was reading about all these theories and creating hypothetical lessons and seating charts, but they had no real-world application. Every class I had was based on this utopian group of kids who all spoke English and functioned at the same level. I never learned how to modify or accommodate the diverse needs that I would find in my room."

Unprepared, Zipper began her first day as an intern sixth-grade teacher in a high-poverty neighborhood in East Palo Alto, California, fully responsible, with next to no support from her university. Sound scary? This is scarier: Zipper's alma mater (which she requested not be identified) is one of the largest producers of teachers in California, credentialing about 2,700 people a year.

Cut to Boston, where Maria Fenwick spent a full year working alongside a mentor teacher through the district-sponsored Boston Teacher Residency. By the time she became a full-fledged fourth-grade teacher, she knew the local curriculum, the community, and the daily demands of education, and she was hungry for her own classroom. She recalls, "I knew what to expect every step of the way."

The crisis confronting teacher education is that, across the country, Fenwick's experience is the exception and Zipper's is the rule. Though there are some leading lights, far too many of America's 1,200-plus schools of education are mired in methods that isolate education from the arts and sciences, segregate the theory and practice of teaching, and provide insufficient time and support for future teachers to learn to work in real classrooms. Far too many universities, for their part, run education programs on the cheap.

The consequences are painfully clear: Half of all new educators abandon the profession within five years, costing schools an estimated $2.6 billion annually and leaving children in the neediest areas with the highest number of inexperienced teachers.

The delinquency in teacher preparation is nothing new, of course -- but it's growing more dire as we ask teachers to perform increasingly challenging tasks: to teach more complex skills to high and measurable standards, and to ensure that every child in an incredibly diverse generation learns these skills equally well. The three R's are not enough anymore.

Based on scientific research, good teaching is one thing we know makes a big difference in children's learning. (Researchers at the University of Tennessee in 1996 found that elementary school students who had three highly effective teachers in a row achieved math scores more than fifty percentile points higher than those who had three ineffective teachers in a row.) The challenge now is to figure out how to make a good teacher -- or, as Thomas Carroll, president of the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF), puts it, "to close the gap between the way we prepare teachers and the way teachers actually teach in the classroom."

A teacher looking into a microscope

Nadirah Muhammad, Boston Teacher Residency:

"My mentor teacher is an amazing woman. She has a very strong presence in the classroom, and the students know that she means business and that she cares."

Credit: Gregory Cherin

Dozens of education schools -- and a few independent agencies, such as the Boston Public Schools -- are pioneering ways to do that. The research on how well these new methods work ranges from nascent to nonexistent so far, but these early models provide a compass for how to begin building better programs -- changes that hold the promise to better equip would-be teachers and, by extension, their future students for success.

Devil's Bargain

So-called normal schools, the precursors to today's schools of education, emerged in the mid-1800s to staff a growing number of classrooms, reports Stanford University historian David Labaree. To meet demands for more accessible higher education, they evolved into four-year teachers' colleges and then state colleges and universities by about 1960. In the late 1900s, some universities that didn't have colleges of education grew them.

From the outset, teacher-training programs faced what Labaree calls a "devil's bargain" between quantity and quality: producing enough teachers to meet demand, or preparing fewer teachers to high standards. Under pressure, he says, they chose quantity.

The sheer numbers of education students (who earn more than 7 percent of the bachelor's degrees and 29 percent of the master's degrees granted nationwide), combined with a focus "more on adequacy than on quality," Labaree says, turned education schools into moneymakers for many universities. "The ed school is the Rodney Dangerfield of higher education," he adds. "It don't get no respect."

No respect doesn't mean no expectations, however, especially not in the past fifteen years or so. A cry for better education programs is rising as the scrutiny on K-12 schools' performance under the No Child Left Behind Act flows upstream to the institutions that prepare teachers. Calls for change have come from both outside and inside teacher education. Add to that the growing competition from alternative certification pathways and homegrown programs like Boston's -- such avenues produced about 41,000 of the 220,000 graduates of teacher-preparation programs in 2004 -- and education schools are feeling the pressure.

"Criticisms of the teacher-education establishment have been so incessant and persistent that the work of that establishment is changing," says Suzanne Wilson, chairwoman of the Department of Teacher Education at Michigan State University's College of Education. "People are not ignoring the critiques anymore."

Prep Gets Real

At the heart of reform in teacher preparation are innovations that provide extensive field experience and link theory more closely with practice.

A mentor teacher speaking to a student teacher

Barbara Simon, mentor, Boston Teacher Residency:

"Some people have the philosophy that teachers should go right into the fire, and I disagree with that. There's some in-between that's good -- to gradually take on the role with some thought behind it, getting to observe before doing."

Credit: Gregory Cherin

Programs such as Boston's go the furthest by transporting the locus of training almost entirely from the university to the K-12 school. Through the four-year-old residency, supported jointly by the school district and local philanthropies, candidates take summer courses geared toward Boston's history and curriculum, then undergo a yearlong mentorship. The financial package -- an $11,000 stipend plus a forgivable tuition loan -- is designed to attract educators from diverse backgrounds. (Melissa Zipper, who survived her first year with help from an outside mentoring program and is still a teacher, had to shell out $19,000 for her degree.)

In between the stale old university methods and the urban teaching residencies is a practical and promising model that's gaining in reach: the professional-development school. As described by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), these programs are partnerships between teacher-preparation programs and K-12 schools that provide settings for student teaching, faculty development, and field-based research -- unions so intimate that they form a hybrid institution. A typical field placement in these school-university teams -- which, as does the Boston program, liken themselves to medical residencies in teaching hospitals -- lasts a semester or two.

Kansas's Emporia State University was an early adopter of the model. Its Teachers College provides training and ongoing support to mentor educators in its thirty-four professional-development schools. In turn, mentors commit to give student teachers weekly evaluations and opportunities to do everything from individual tutoring to whole-class teaching. University staff visit classrooms regularly to assess candidates' progress and provide feedback. All the while, the educators-in-training reconvene in university classes to debrief and draw connections to theories of education.

"The key to the success of these programs is that no matter what theory students are learning about, they get to see it in practice immediately," says Dean Tes Mehring.

The payoff: The attrition rate of ESU graduates from teaching is a low 7.2 percent after three years, and principals rate alumni highly on a wide range of knowledge and skills.

Measure This

Besides the theory-practice bond, assessment -- the watchword in K-12 schools -- is catching on in teacher preparation. Education schools at the forefront of this change are creating and using various assessments to measure candidates' skills and identify and improve weaknesses in their programs. ESU, for instance, evaluates candidates via tests, observations, and performance tasks at regular intervals; those who perform below par -- about 4 to 5 percent of students per semester -- get dropped from the teaching program.

A teacher-education student at his desk

Pablo Aguilera, Stanford University:

"You can make people go to school for five years and tell them to read any number of books, but they won't really learn anything until they're in an actual classroom."

Credit: Bart Nagel

It may sound odd in this assessment-happy age, but no, education schools have not always done this. Some impetus for change comes from the NCATE, which accredits 632 of the nation's education schools. In 2001, the organization reinvented its standards to demand more evidence of program outcomes ("what candidates know and can do"), not simply inputs such as coursework and field experience.

Two teams of universities have created teaching-performance assessments that could be used more broadly. The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT), developed by thirty public and private universities, embeds various assessments in candidates' coursework and demands a capstone documentation of three to five teaching hours, including lesson plans, videotapes, and student work. Teacher Work Samples, an assessment methodology adopted by eleven schools nationwide in a coalition called the Renaissance Group, use detailed standards and a rubric to evaluate how well candidates teach a four-week unit.

Raymond Pecheone, co-executive director of Stanford University's School Redesign Network and PACT's project director, draws this analogy: "Back in the early '90s, we used to evaluate people's writing by giving them a multiple-choice exam. This is not rocket science, but if you want to test how well people write, you've got to ask them to write. These tests are sorely needed."

Two even more neglected but emerging education-school adaptations are training in how to use technology for learning, and induction support for beginning teachers after graduation.

Road Not Traveled

One problem in the quest for quality is that accountability measures so far have been mainly quantitative, not qualitative. The federal government, via NCLB, demands that, to be "highly qualified," teachers possess expertise in their subject matter and certification from their state. This requirement assumes that certification ensures skill. In reality, states generally focus more on the number and type of candidates' training experiences than the quality.

A state might require 300 hours of student teaching for licensure, for instance, but "rotten schools of education can place bad students in failing K-12 schools with weak teachers" and still meet the requirement, says Arthur Levine, former president of Columbia University's Teachers College and author of the 2006 report "Educating School Teachers."

Further obscuring the best practices, hardly any education schools have ever followed up with alumni to measure their effectiveness on the job -- until now.

"Historically, a school of education could claim to be strong and be recognized around the country with no evidence about how its teachers perform in the classroom," says the NCTAF's Thomas Carroll. "That day is over."

Early efforts at this kind of accountability have used simple surveys -- not the most rigorous form of research, but they're a start.

Another problem: There is little scientific evidence to guide the way. The small pool of research on what works in teacher preparation generally lacks rigor, and it dates to the days before many of these reforms came about. Education researchers have taken notice of the vacuum and have begun working to fill it, but evidence will take years to build.

A graph showing average student expenditure for various types of college programs

Click to enlarge picture

Source: Educational Policy, January and March 2000

More challenges lie ahead. To fully commit to a model of professional-development schools, for one, requires money. Emporia State University's Teachers College has managed it through permanent state allocations and strong commitment by the university, as well as by holding vacant some faculty positions and asking students to pay half of their mentor teachers' $500 annual stipends.

Marshall "Mike" Smith, education-program director at the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and a former education official in the Clinton and Carter administrations, says broad reform will come only if states revise their standards to demand more field experience with good supervision. According to data compiled by the Education Commission of the States, minimum requirements for student teaching now range from 180 hours in Louisiana to 100 days in Maryland. (The most common figure is about twelve weeks.)

States also must commit more money to preparation programs, Smith says, and teachers themselves must demand better training. What could incite that kind of demand? "Evidence that something else worked clearly better," he responds, "which we don't have."

The need is urgent; teachers work at the frontier of everything education is meant to do. Public education itself grapples intimately with big changes in America, from new languages to health epidemics to economic imperatives. Our answer to the challenge of improving teachers' training will influence the experience children have in classrooms -- and the skills with which children enter adult life -- for years to come. It's a question of what kind of future we want to create.

Grace Rubenstein is a senior producer at Edutopia.

This article originally published on 11/14/2007

see more see less

Comments (58)

Comment RSS
Melissa Miranda (not verified)

Teaching

Was this helpful?
0

Student teaching was very exciting for me. Iknew from doing so that I wanted to work with the our Mentally Handicapped population. I got many ideas and was very excited but scared at the same time. When I first started it was a big mess. I cried a lot and swore that I was in the wrong proffesion. I wanted to be a stay home mom again. Yet, it has been three years and now am going through my Masters program. I am still confronted with many obstacles thoughout the years and feel I am growing every year. Teaching is a gift and to all teachers I know it does not come easy, but what does.

RJ (not verified)

Teaching in an English-based school in N Amer.

Was this helpful?
0

Try doing all of the above with students who do not understand English...and then add in their parents, your managers, and just about everyone else u meet. Then while u r trying to successfully communicate with your neighbors add to that the fact that u must FOCUS all your efforts on learning how to CONNECT with not just one or two age groups or levels like those that the N Amer teacher mentor/trainer helped you with, but learn how to meet the individual and group needs of every age and level as well. All the while learning to adapt successfully to your newly adopted culture.
Try that and see if u think that u have had a hard day at work. We all have/had them. Bite the bullet and try again. This world really needs great teachers to help create, build and grow tomorrows great leaders.

Thank you to those of you who persevere.

ANne (not verified)

Ah...But You Made It

Was this helpful?
0

Michele,

I am sorry the first day was so hard, but I am equally glad that it wasn't easy! All of us have been there at one time or another, and sadly there will be repeat incidents. The key to success is reflection: what did I do that worked and why do I think so? What did I do that didn't work, and how will I fix it?

Take baby-steps. Start small. It sounds like you already have. Students need to learn procedures and norms. What do you expect and how does it look/sound? You need to practice this a lot to make it stick. Celebrate their efforts and provide feedback constantly. These things are the foundation of the rest. It takes a good deal of time, but the payoff is worth it.

Try to remind yourself why you wanted to teach. I am certain it wasn't for the money or summer breaks. Instead it is likely that you wanted to make a difference in the life if a child. Today you did. When a child misbehaved and you stayed calm and collected that child saw something special. When you spoke clearly and respectfully about what you wanted to make the classroom safe for all, that child heard something special. And when you said, "Have a nice evening and I'll see you tomorrow," that child felt something special - you weren't giving up!

Good luck!

Michele (not verified)

I (barely) made it through my first year teaching

Was this helpful?
0

I (barely) made it through my first day of my first year teaching. It was horrible! I am discouraged, disappointed, and wondering if I wasted the last two years in school and thousands of dollars in tuition. I hope it gets better. I have a mentor in another grade. The other two first grade teachers are new to the school, too. I also feel that college classes prepared me for some teaching theories, if I ever get to that point. Right now, I have to teach my students to walk in line, listen to me, keep their hands to themselves, not throw chairs, stay in their seat, etc. I don't know that any class can prepare you for that!

Heather Sweet (not verified)

"I do, We do, You do" strategy

Was this helpful?
0

Hello Heather -- I found it interesting that you referenced the "I do, We do, You do" strategy. This is something that my county has recently incorporated into our teaching. It's something that I think most teachers do without identifying it. We always model, then work some examples with the students, then allow them to do the work independently. I think it's great they have a term for it now.

Further, I agree with you when you said it should be incorporated into the teacher preparation programs. Like you, I too have mixed feelings about my undergraduate program. I am going to begin my fourth year of teaching this fall and I am just now beginning to feel comfortable with calling myself a teaching professional as well as being comfortable with my confidence level regarding my skills and abilities. I found that during my first year I really could not rely on what I had learned in college.

Heather Jones (not verified)

Grade Level Training

Was this helpful?
0

I agree with you Lisa; I am not sure exactly what the most ideal preparation colleges can provide to new teachers. Perhaps the districts and counties can help by taking on a more personal role with that teacher. With my certificate to teach elementary education, I student taught 3rd grade, but was hired to teach 1st. As much information as I received from the big county pre-service orientations... I would have liked school and grade specific guidance. There are 22 elementary schools in our county and I know that each one is unique in teaching the county curriculum. It is my opinion that new teachers receive their training in that school with a member of their grade level team.

Darci (not verified)

First Year Teaching

Was this helpful?
0

I agree that a "mentor teacher" or a "team teacher" to work closely with by sharing ideas, planning lessons and reflecting together is a great idea and a huge assest to someone's first year teaching. I also agree that we might lose some potentially great teachers to the "sink or swim" idea. My twin sister and I had completely different first year teaching experiences. My sister did not have a mentor or a team teacher to work with. The teachers on her team were very busy in their own lives and offered her very little support, even when she asked for it. Also, her classroom was located on the opposite side of the school from the rest of her teammates. I was hired at a different school district and had an excellent mentor teacher. Needless-to-say, I had a good first year with the support and friendship of my mentor and fabulous teammates. My sister struggled all year long, feeling stressed-out and alone. She is an excellent teacher, but, she decided not to be a classroom teacher after that. Now she runs a tutoring center and is very happy, however, I think she would still be in a classroom to this day if she had gotten more support her first year.

Heather Jones (not verified)

Confronting the Crisis in Teacher Training

Was this helpful?
0

With one year under my belt, I am in great anticipation that this year will be easier than last year. Although student teaching provided me with some classroom experience, it was nothing in comparison to having little support with my very own class of students. After reading this article, I had very mixed emotions about my personal teacher training. I was relieved to hear that others had similar frustrations of sink or swim. I was also frustrated and disappointed with the county for the lack of preparation they provided to me. If the cost of hiring new teachers were so grand, I would expect administration to "guide" new teachers and give them the necessary tools and resources to have a rewarding first few years of teaching. At our school, we have a common saying for the learning curve, "I do, we do, you do." Simply stated, I (the teacher) introduce a new concept, we work through it together, and then eventually the student is able to complete the task on his own. It is a shame this is not the philosophy of teacher training.

Lisa Moorehead (not verified)

Building a Better Teacher

Was this helpful?
0

After my first year of teaching I had the fortune of running into one of my college professors at a social event. She had taught me in several of the educational training classes that I had taken while in college. It was really startling to have her ask me how well they had trained me to be a teacher. As hard as it was, I told her that I did not really feel prepared at all. She asked me what they could have done better, and to be honest, I told her I didn't know. They had schooled me on preparing tests, keeping gradebooks, making bulletin boards, and managing classroom discipline, plus much, much, more. However, I was not prepared for all of the personal problems of the students. Nor was I prepared for the onslaught of daily rituals -- absentee reports, morning reports, tardy slips, picture money collecting, being a class sponsor, etc. And all of this was supposed to happen and I was also required to TEACH?????? It was an overwhelming task and still is.

However, short of throwing a person into a classroom and saying "Teach," I am not sure how to incorporate all of these extras into a college course -- especially because all schools are different.

Frances Mary Werking (not verified)

Team Teaching

Was this helpful?
0

In my first year teaching fifth grade, I also was fortunate enough to share a grade level with two teachers open to team teaching. What an experience! We each took a core subject and taught three classrooms in rounds, fiddling with different groupings until we found ones that supported our students best. We also worked out a management plan that would be consistent with all three classrooms. The toughest part was conferences. We couldn't find the time to meet with all 99 parents, so we provided updates for the parents and met with parents who specifically asked for all three of us to be present. After one year, one teacher moved to another district, but I continued to team teach with the other for four years.

see more see less