Martin Scorsese on the Importance of Visual Literacy

The filmmaker touches on topics ranging from the importance of teaching visual literacy to violence in films to the preservation of classic movies. More to this story.

The filmmaker touches on topics ranging from the importance of teaching visual literacy to violence in films to the preservation of classic movies. More to this story.

Release Date: 10/10/06

Get Video

Embed Video

Cut and paste the text below to embed this video on your website:

<iframe width="480" height="270" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/I90ZluYvHic?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Visit our embeddable player instructions page for more information about embedding Edutopia videos.

Transcript

Martin Scorsese on the Importance of Visual Literacy (Transcript)

Scorsese: You know, I come from a working class family. My mother and father weren’t well-educated. Second generation, I guess, Italian American. And there was no tradition of reading in the house. No books. Of course, I read in school, etc. I read books in school and that sort of thing, but the-- it was more of a visual tradition, more if-- I was taken to movie theaters a lot. Also, being a sickly child with very severe asthma, I couldn’t play sports. So, again, the movie theater. The movie theater and the church. The church and the movie theatre. And so, along with the films, there was also the advent of television, 1948, ’49, in the heyday of really the best-- some of the best programming in American television-- in the history of American television up to this point with the fifties, 1950s. And so I saw a lot of television shows, but also films on television. Being a working class family, too, they didn’t have enough money to go to the theatre, so theatre wasn’t an option, live stage shows. So, it was mainly visual literacy what was-- was what was happening at that time to me. I did not understand that that was happening. What it made me realize was that there was an intelligence, another kind of intelligence, that was trying to tell a story through where the director, the writer and the cinematographer, where they were focusing your eyes, you know. Whether it was the-- the camera may be at an extremely low angle, looking up at you, the use of the lens, the size of the lens. I began to understand certain lenses did-- interpreted the story differently. A longer lens crushed everything together and made it flat. A wider lens stretched everything and some don’t distort it, especially if camera movement-- I learned looking at certain pictures, particularly Welles’s films and William Wyler, too. A wide angle lens, but Wyler used his wide angle lens in a very strong, steady image, but Welles used that wide angle lens, 18 mm, it turns out very often, to move along the walls, move along-- and you really felt-- I felt as if the camera was flying, as if the story was flying by, you know. I didn’t know why until I kept seeing the films again and again, and as I began to know a little more about what filmmaking was like and what cameras did, and at that’s-- I still didn’t know who made the pictures, you know, but I was beginning to understand that there are certain tools you use, and those tools become part of a vocabulary that’s just as valid as that vocabulary that is used in literature and our language.

Scorsese: One has to begin, I think, reach younger people at an earlier age for that to shape their minds to-- in a critical way-- a critical way of looking at these images and what they mean and how to interpret imagery. And I think in a more official way, I think, than just punching up on a computer or seeing something on a TV commercial or something like that. I think you really need to know how ideas and emotions are expressed through a visual form. Now that for- that form could be video, you know, or film, probably eventually be digital video from a long period-- for a long time to come, but it still has the same rules. And it still has the same vocabulary, and it still has the same grammar, I should say, really the same grammar. And the grammar is panning left and right, tracking in or out, you know, booming up and down, intercutting a certain way, use of a close-up as opposed to a medium shot. Was is a medium shot? What is a long shot? All these sort of things and how do you use all of these elements and the different kinds of lighting, and how you use all these elements to make an emotional and psychological point to an audience, and I think we have to begin to teach our younger people how to use this very powerful tool, because we know film, the image, can be so strong for-- not only for good, for good use, but also for bad use. Look at World War II and look at the films that were made in Germany. Look at the great director, Leni Riefenstahl. Look at her “Triumph of the Will” and how that really-- the extraordinary ability she had as a filmmaker that helped shape the policies of the Third Reich, and of course, we know what that lead to. And so film is very powerful. Images are very powerful, I should say, and we have to start-- begin to teach younger people how to use them and what they-- and at least to begin to understand to interpret them.

Scorsese: I think it is good if a young person wants to express themselves and take a video camera and go out. They’re going to find that they have to frame the image, and in framing the image, they’re going to find that they have to interpret what they want to say to an audience. And how do you point the audience’s eye to look where you want them to look and to get the point, the emotional, psychological point that you want to get across to them. They’re going to have to make that decision. The real making of the filmmakers when they look through that viewfinder to tell the story, and I don’t mean just telling a story man goes, you know man-- boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy gets girl. No, I mean a story could be the story-- a story could be rain hitting a tree, leaves. That could be your story, you know, but how? Where do you begin to put the camera? Then let them see what they do. Then, you know, I mean, yes, there’s a curiosity in children and young people. They may try one or two and then they realize it’s not for me, and they move on, but there might be those one or two that realize, “And if I put the camera under this leaf and I see this drop of rain coming at it, I get it in such a way, and if I wait for a certain hour in which the sun is glistening and then...” Who knows? May not be a filmmaker. May be a great painter, but you’ll find that they will learn. They will learn as they do it. At the same time, at the same time, the respect for the language of cinema itself, the history should be taught and the visual literacy should be taught, because there are others who are not going to be able to do that. There are others who can’t afford to get a camera, and this is one of the things. My-- where I came from, we couldn’t afford any 8 mm cameras or anything like that. I drew pictures. I imagined that they moved, but I drew them.

Scorsese: You know, violence is an all-- is an encompassing word. It’s a word that takes in so much. It depends on the world you’re depicting. It depends on the audience you’re aiming for, and then there’s the issue of your responsibility to the story and to the world that you’re depicting, and if you’re going to go on a realistic basis, let’s say, where a world I came from, although is good, hardworking people trying to raise a family respectably, there was a lot of organized crime, and I saw a lot of violence where I grew up. I just saw it. It was part of me. When it came time for me to make movies, I knew those films were not for children. That was a time before-- that was a time with the rating system, but it was before cable television. I knew those films would never be shown on television, and if they were, they’d be edited to the point where they were unintelligible and I couldn’t care less, because I wouldn’t want them shown at six o’clock at night or eight o’clock at night for a child of mine to see. The violence that I have in my pictures and again, you know, be self-criticized, people say sure, you know, “The kind of violence you do, you think is alright, but for anybody else who does it, you’re criticizing them.” But when we’re talking about the violence in my films, it’s not pleasant. It’s not pleasant, and I’ve just finished a film, now. I’m working on this film right now, which is very violent. And it’s not pleasant at all. And it’s not-- you reap what you sow in the stories I’m trying to tell, and I don’t know any other way to show it. And it-- and there’s also to deal with the very, very dangerous aspect of that adrenaline one has as young that could be expressed many different ways and some sort of excitement, whether it’s sexual excitement or violence or whatever, there’s that danger that one has to know. That’s part of what it is being human, especially young, and that could go wrong. And when it goes wrong, this could happen. Now, the world I came from, the world I knew, or aspects, I should say of the world I knew, a lot of times was a valid form of expression. That’s the world I’m-- that’s the world I’m-- that’s the human condition. That is the human condition, and it’s tragic and it’s set up in such a way that will-- it will do us in as a species, if we don’t learn about it. I don’t put it up there for people to enjoy it, you know? And if they are enjoying it, they catch themselves enjoying it, and the characters pay for it. Watch the characters pay for it, particularly in “Goodfellas” and in “Raging Bull”, in this film, “The Departed”, which I just finished also.

Scorsese: Well, I think you have to make room for film in curriculum. I don’t think it’s time, and I don’t-- and this is a key thing, we don’t mean to be having young people take two hours of their time or three hours of their time a week or however the curriculum works to just sit and enjoy a movie. No. This is a learning experience. That also doesn’t mean that you take a notebook and you write down everything in the notes as you’re watching the film, because you can’t see the film. So, what you’re doing is training the eye and the heart of the student to look at a film in a different way by asking questions and pointing to different ideas, different concepts, suggestions. You’re training them to think about a story that’s told to you in visual terms in a different way and to take it seriously. I don’t say it’s a great film. You can learn more from even a bad film, you know, and so, uh.. this is why it’s so important, I think, because so much in-- of today’s society is done visually and even subliminally for young people that it could be dangerous, and one has to know it’s a very, very powerful tool.

Credits

Video Credits

Interview by

  • Ken Ellis

Editor:

  • Amy Erin Borovoy

Camera Crew:

  • Dominic Orlando
  • Matt LaGreca

© 2006 | The George Lucas Educational Foundation | All Rights Reserved

Comments (17)

Comment RSS
Life Skills Support Teacher

The only problem with using

Was this helpful?
0

The only problem with using Hollywood or even independently produced product as a visual aid in the classroom is that so much of it is historically inaccurate and biased. Even documentaries are often biased. To properly educate, a teacher should present both sides of most any issue and let students decide which side to believe. I know of a teacher who taught 20th century world history and showed film of the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945. Yet, not one mention was made of the atrocities committed by Japan upon the people of occupied China, especially during the Massacre of Nanking in 1937, where hundreds of thousands of Chinese were tortured and killed by Japanese soldiers. A documentary about that horrific event exists, but the teacher, perhaps inadvertently, injected bias into the lesson not showing it.

It's like teaching a unit on American Indians and showing only "Dances with Wolves." It's the cinematic equivalent of a history book written by Howard Zinn with a singular point of view.

Film is more visual and hence, more powerful at presenting a message. I see fewer opportunities for bias in film adaptations of fiction novels, such as the 1962 film version of To Kill a Mockingbird or the 1984 British version of 1984.

Speaking of Martin Scorsese ... I clearly remember the firestorm of controversy when his The Last Temptation of Christ was released in 1988. Since that time, it has become an accepted companion piece in theological studies as offering an alternate view of the Gospels, even in parochial institutions. I showed it to my film production class at Villanova University in 2004 without incident or complaint.

Above all, we must offer students choices in what to believe. Too many teachers use their positions as bully pulpits for their own political views. Film choices, like book choices, have to be carefully considered.

How to incorporate visual literacy into your curriculum

Was this helpful?
0

I teach English and Film Arts at a high school in San Diego. For Film Arts, I use the book "The Art of Watching Films." For English, I use that book as well as the media literacy sections in the McDougal-Littell textbooks. Many high school ELA standards lend themselves to the teaching of visual literacy, and Film Arts employs a combination of those ELA standards, VAPA/Visual Arts standards, VAPA/Theatre standards, and CCTE Arts, Media and Entertainment Industry Sector standards.

Learn about visual literacy

Was this helpful?
0

I produced an 8-part public television series about visual literacy titled "The Language of Photography". It has aired as a college level telecourse in many markets. You can find it at http://films.com/search.aspx?q=%22language+of+photography%22. Dante Betteo.

After School care at the Austin Discovery School (Challenge School)

Spoken as a true visual lover...

Was this helpful?
0

Loved this footage, didn't catch it all, something at the end corupted but loved what I got to hear! When film touches you deeply you understand the power and the beauty of it, you hold close the language of film...

I am using video for the first time with children this summer and am excited about how and what the children are learning about themselves and how their actual personalities are developing due to the exposure of this form of art and story telling. The children are engaged, entertained and are very willing to participate in all the projects.

The children are too new to this art form to understand much about the cameras role just yet (I am letting them shoot all of the video) but are still rather immersed in how they are feeling in front of the camera, what emotions they are revealing in the acting, the stories we are using and what they are thinking abd feeling as they watch footage of themselves and their friends...

Yes, I agree with M.S., but I too love film, using it as a legitamate teaching method is exquisite.

Moral and social lessons through film were important to me growing up. The happy, healthy structure of human beings is important to me. The furthering of good lessons and healthful emotions in film making is crucial. Whatever and however we can share this with our children is welcomed from an artistic POV and as a teaching tool for the possible structure of their lives...

Writer, Writing tutor

Was this helpful?
0

Using Visual Literacy alongside literature is also very exciting. Reading a classic, say and then ultimately watching as film, even if not a good film, offers hours of analysis and discussion. I treasured my Film and Lit classes, and wish I could take more of them!

Digital Nomad Scavenger and Web2.0 Evangelist

Visual Literacy resources for learning

Was this helpful?
0

Links to Visual Literacy resources can be found on Shambles at
http://www.shambles.net/pages/learning/artdesign/visuallit/

Cherish Hughes (not verified)

I agree with Mr. Scorsese

Was this helpful?
0

I agree with Mr. Scorsese about how our kids learn so much better with visual stimulation. Everything for them is so immediate whether it be TV, computers, or video games. I like that he analyzes the video versus just taking it for what you see. It will teach the kids to question which so powerful.

Wayne E Crenwelge (not verified)

Looking to Learn

Was this helpful?
0

Mr. Scorsese has it right. Visual is a way to reach many of our students....not all, but most. It is sad to think that many of today's students do not LIKE to read. It has become a seeing world. If we don't tap into this method of teaching, we will not effectively teach our students Social Studies, History, or Geography.

Billie Linda McMenamy (not verified)

I think Martin Scorsese has

Was this helpful?
+1

I think Martin Scorsese has come up with a great idea to offer free curriculum using classic films to help foster critical thinking and understanding in our students. Teachers are always looking for ways to help make learning more meaningful and exciting. Our students today are surrounded by visual immagery all the time and it's important for them to interpret it for good or bad.

Alexis Crutchfield (not verified)

I agree with Martin

Was this helpful?
0

I agree with Martin Scorsese's comments. The students do learn more visually. I believe that some of us already teach students in a form of this way by looking at picture books and analyzing the pictures in the book. The students learn that this helps determine mood and setting.

see more see less