Edutopia on Facebook
Edutopia on Twitter
Edutopia on Google+
Edutopia on Pinterest Follow Me on Pinterest
WHAT WORKS IN EDUCATION The George Lucas Educational Foundation

Technical Writing: Practice for the Common Core

Technical Writing: Practice for the Common Core

Related Tags: STEM
More Related Discussions
3 488 Views
T. R. Girill Society for Technical Communication/Lawrence Livermore National Lab. trgirill@acm.org Technical Writing: Practice for the Common Core To implement the literacy requirements of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS) in science classes calls for a good thematic sense of direction. But it also calls for some specific teaching techniques hooked to relevant student projects. Even with a big-picture usability viewpoint and the six implementation themes in mind (see last month's note on "Themes from the Common Core"), you still need to fit CCSS practice into your busy day. Hence, practical CCSS activities must meet two criteria: (1) On-going: They involve student technical writing that occurs (or could easily occur) already, and (2) Authentic: The writing also has obvious, important, real-world counterparts (not like the famously contrived "five-paragraph essay"). Here are five science-student writing projects that meet both of these criteria. Drafting Instructions You and your students already use (and probably draft) lots of instructions for lab procedures and equipment. You can make this a Common-Core skill-building activity by dissecting the strengths and weaknesses of those instructions, externalizing their pitfalls and their best improvements. An overt good-instruction checklist not only makes this easy, it also shows students how technical professionals (aircraft pilots, surgeons, construction managers) improve their own reliability. See the good-instruction guidelines at http://www.ebstc.org/TechLit/trgintro2.html to get started; see Atul Gawande's The Checklist Manifesto for background. Revising Descriptions Descriptions of tools used, phenomena observed, and plans made are vital in every student report or presentation. And of course your textbook is full of model technical descriptions. Armed with a checklist of good-description features such as http://www.ebstc.org/TechLit/trgintro3.html students can revise their own draft descriptions and those of others. Not at all pedantic busy work, this is just how professional journal articles, clinical reports, and crime-scene analyses are really crafted. As with well-designed instructions, this approach stresses usability for readers. Taking Notes Field notes, lab notes, or just personal summaries of what they read or hear all afford an excellent opportunity for students to practice daily the use of visual and structural features (lists, headings, tables) to help manage content effectively, as encouraged throughout the Common Core standards. You can easily scaffold such improvements (for example, see http://www.ebstc.org/TechLit/notes/notetop.html ). Each kind of student note taking has a real-life counterpart. And the impact of notes drafted with usability in mind ranges from general self-help (faster, easier intellectual success) to specific technical triumphs (notebooks usable by others are crucial to support patent applications). Designing Abstracts Project abstracts--short, tightly organized work summaries--are the most disciplined writing assignments that most students undertake. Whether for your review or for official use by science-fair judges, abstracts are a great way for students to focus on audience needs, a key Common-Core theme. An abstract template can externalize what this requires: http://www.ebstc.org/TechLit/handbook/abstracts.analysis.html Once they leave school, your students will find many chances to apply their abstract-crafting skills: journals demand them, databases circulate them around the world, and medical doctors even prescribe treatments based on them. Crafting Posters Technical posters have long been an essential part of science- fair projects. Now they are an increasingly common way for student researchers to share their efforts with classmates and even with working professionals. As scaffolds such as this point out, http://tvsef.llnl.gov/tvsef_poster_make.html poster design applies familiar Common-Core communication principles to a very unusual set of size, distance, and social-context constraints. Yet this odd situation exactly parallels how real scientists, engineers, and medical practitioners share their own recent results at any technical conference. So here are five literacy activities already at hand within typical science classes. All of them, properly scaffolded, can offer your students (1) practice in designing usable text, (2) a way to meet Common-Core writing standards, and, best of all, (3) robust preparation for life after school.

Comments (3)Sign in or register to postSubscribe to comments via RSS

Discussion High School Innovative STEM Professional Development

Last comment 6 days 20 hours ago in Professional Development

Discussion How to make the most out of a learning garden

Last comment 3 weeks 12 hours ago in Learning Environments

Discussion Technical Writing: Text Simplification is Hard Work

Last comment 2 weeks 3 days ago in STEM

Discussion 10 Signs of a 21st Century Classroom

Last comment 5 days 14 hours ago in STEM

blog Quick, Draw a Scientist!

Last comment 1 month 7 hours ago in STEM

Sign in to comment. Not a member? Register.