Teachers Get Flak for Showing Flicks

Want to use movies in your classroom? Better watch your step.

Want to use movies in your classroom? Better watch your step.
films in education

To a generation of kids weaned on movies, using film in the classroom may seem like a natural educational tool for smart teachers. But the move to use cinema to teach a whole range of subjects -- history, sociology, perspective, and visual literacy quickly spring to mind -- may be a lot trickier than it seems. It can also get downright explosive.

Earlier this year, for instance, in a suburban Seattle high school, the film An Inconvenient Truth got even more inconvenient when parents complained that the school didn't present a balanced perspective about the film's warning of global warming. School district policy states that films presented must be accompanied by a "credible, legitimate opposing view."

The Federal Way Public School District, in Federal Way, Washington, imposed a temporary moratorium on the film; after two weeks of criticism in the local and national scenes, the school board still insisted that opposing views be considered.

Meanwhile, the Chicago Board of Education was sued in May after a substitute teacher showed the R-rated (and Oscar-winning) film Brokeback Mountain to an eighth-grade class. The lawsuit claims student Jessica Turner suffered psychological distress after viewing the movie at Ashburn Community Elementary School. The film, according to the lawsuit filed in Cook County Circuit Court, was shown without permission from parents and guardians.

The twelve-year-old and her grandparents, Kenneth and LaVerne Richardson, seek more than $400,000 in damages. Turner's grandfather and guardian, Kenneth Richardson, explained, "It is very important to me that my children not be exposed to this."

Teachers have long known that community standards -- which vary widely around the country -- often dictate what they can (and can't) show in the classroom. Typically, parents are informed a few days before the showing of a film, allowing them a chance to have their child dismissed from the showing.

Still, controversies remain. Denise Harman, an instructor at the Dale Jackson Career Center, in Lewisville, Texas, recalls one teacher in her school getting an earful from a parent after showing The Graduate, director Mike Nichols's celebrated coming-of-age movie. "It's a great film for the students to watch and learn from, because it's got a wonderful script and great production," Harman says.

It also has a very brief showing of a woman's back after she undresses. "The teacher didn't realize that it would be controversial -- but they do now!" Harman says. Sometimes it's surprising where the line is drawn. The result, according to Harman: "We're more careful in what we show."

These concerns have some prominent filmmakers worried. "The one thing that each and every one of us uses every day is our creativity," says John Lasseter, an Academy Award-winning American animator and director of such films as Toy Story, A Bug's Life, and Cars. "Teaching film is not the issue; we're teaching creativity. We want to show kids how to imagine and create. We can use filmmaking to do that. We need to help kids nurture their creative side."

It's a particularly important issue to Lasseter, whose mother spent thirty-eight years as an art teacher at Bell Gardens Senior High School, in Los Angeles. "As a child, I saw the French film The Red Balloon in class. I still think about that afternoon to this day."

Francis Ford Coppola, another Oscar-winning director, whose work includes The Godfather and Apocalypse Now, has an idea: "Maybe we should trade the secretary of education position for a secretary of youth," he says. "We should be thinking not just about educating students, but about inspiring them."

James Daly is the former editorial director of Edutopia.

This article originally published on 8/28/2007

see more see less

Comments (24)

Comment RSS
Dennis Lynch (not verified)

Films in class

Was this helpful?
0

How can there be any sort of balanced side to a debate about Global warming? There is the scientific and measured side which clearly indicates that there is something drastically changing, and then there is the corporate side which is funded by oil companies that denies that they are causing a problem, because they don't want to pay to clean up their mess.
There are no credible films to provide the other, wrong, point of view.

Similarly, INHERIT THE WIND would be a great film for HS biology or history to cover the evolution debates. There is no balancing film for the nonsense that is intelligent design, because it would promote a non-scientific and religious point of view.
Teaching the controversy is a phrase used only by ID proponents since they have no evidence to support their position.

There is no excuse for most R-rated films to be shown to any students under 17.
But how many of your schools out there show SAVING PRIVATE RYAN, despite the violence and language, because it's good history, and its proof that war is always a bad idea?

Anonymous (not verified)

One day my child was happy

Was this helpful?
0

One day my child was happy to report that a class watched a bootleg version of a new action film...not part of the curriculum, just a terrible use of school time and a totally wrong message about theft.

JMG (not verified)

Movies in the Classroom

Was this helpful?
0

I teach high school and I would never show a R rated movie, no matter how many academy awards it won. I only show two movies a year and they are appropriate for the subject that I teach. What eighth grade subject could possibly warrant showing Brokeback Mountain. That example does not even belong in this article. It should be used in an article about having responsible substitute teachers.

MJM (not verified)

Movies in the classroom

Was this helpful?
0

I thought it was odd to hear directors and other film makers promoting the use of films in the classroom. Hollywood has worked tirelessly to make sure teachers and librarians understand that just because you purchased a movie doesn't mean you have public performace rights-those cost more and in some cases are difficult to find. Copyright holders of older materials may be impossible to locate. The issues of copyright are stifling the creativity of the next generation not the community's views on moral standards

see more see less