Abstinence-only education does not work

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on March 30, 2008 - 18:40.

Yes, it IS illegal for children under a certain age to engage in sexual intercourse. But that doesn't mean children/teens are going to refrain from doing so altogether. If that were the case, there would be no such thing as teenage drug use or vandalization, for example. This is not an adequate argument in favor of abstinence. Parents have the right to teach their children however they choose, but is teaching them only about abstinence really working? If it were, there wouldn't be SO MANY teen pregnancies and contractions of STDs. We need to inform children/teens about contraceptives and STD protection. It is time for parents, schools, religious groups, etc. to realize that abstinence is not the only way.

Reply

Share your thoughts on this story. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your name and city, and by demonstrating respect for others' opinions. Comments will not appear immediately; all comments are moderated and will be posted in order of submission.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options