why not?

Submitted by David Phillips (not verified) on September 12, 2007 - 11:38.

So what, exactly is wrong with a "credible, legitimate opposing view?" If Mr. Gore's film can't stand up to opposition, then it's not much of an argument. As teachers, we dare not be threatened by students who want to think, school boards who require us to be politically balanced or parents who wish to question what we teach. If you are right, logical argument is no threat. If you are only biased, argument may threaten you, but only if you have a weak position.

I've been questioned before by parents and administrators, and I've welcomed their questions and even their objections every time. It makes me a better teacher.

Reply

Share your thoughts on this story. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your name and city, and by demonstrating respect for others' opinions. Comments will not appear immediately; all comments are moderated and will be posted in order of submission.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options