Confronting the Crisis in Teacher Training

Innovative schools of education invent better ways to prep educators for the classroom.

Innovative schools of education invent better ways to prep educators for the classroom.
Illustration of a sculptor creating a teacher
Credit: Thomas Reis

Melissa Zipper needs less than a second to tally the value of her teacher-preparation experience: "Nothing."

Looking back on the nine-month master's degree program, she elaborates, "I was reading about all these theories and creating hypothetical lessons and seating charts, but they had no real-world application. Every class I had was based on this utopian group of kids who all spoke English and functioned at the same level. I never learned how to modify or accommodate the diverse needs that I would find in my room."

Unprepared, Zipper began her first day as an intern sixth-grade teacher in a high-poverty neighborhood in East Palo Alto, California, fully responsible, with next to no support from her university. Sound scary? This is scarier: Zipper's alma mater (which she requested not be identified) is one of the largest producers of teachers in California, credentialing about 2,700 people a year.

Cut to Boston, where Maria Fenwick spent a full year working alongside a mentor teacher through the district-sponsored Boston Teacher Residency. By the time she became a full-fledged fourth-grade teacher, she knew the local curriculum, the community, and the daily demands of education, and she was hungry for her own classroom. She recalls, "I knew what to expect every step of the way."

The crisis confronting teacher education is that, across the country, Fenwick's experience is the exception and Zipper's is the rule. Though there are some leading lights, far too many of America's 1,200-plus schools of education are mired in methods that isolate education from the arts and sciences, segregate the theory and practice of teaching, and provide insufficient time and support for future teachers to learn to work in real classrooms. Far too many universities, for their part, run education programs on the cheap.

The consequences are painfully clear: Half of all new educators abandon the profession within five years, costing schools an estimated $2.6 billion annually and leaving children in the neediest areas with the highest number of inexperienced teachers.

The delinquency in teacher preparation is nothing new, of course -- but it's growing more dire as we ask teachers to perform increasingly challenging tasks: to teach more complex skills to high and measurable standards, and to ensure that every child in an incredibly diverse generation learns these skills equally well. The three R's are not enough anymore.

Based on scientific research, good teaching is one thing we know makes a big difference in children's learning. (Researchers at the University of Tennessee in 1996 found that elementary school students who had three highly effective teachers in a row achieved math scores more than fifty percentile points higher than those who had three ineffective teachers in a row.) The challenge now is to figure out how to make a good teacher -- or, as Thomas Carroll, president of the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future (NCTAF), puts it, "to close the gap between the way we prepare teachers and the way teachers actually teach in the classroom."

A teacher looking into a microscope

Nadirah Muhammad, Boston Teacher Residency:

"My mentor teacher is an amazing woman. She has a very strong presence in the classroom, and the students know that she means business and that she cares."

Credit: Gregory Cherin

Dozens of education schools -- and a few independent agencies, such as the Boston Public Schools -- are pioneering ways to do that. The research on how well these new methods work ranges from nascent to nonexistent so far, but these early models provide a compass for how to begin building better programs -- changes that hold the promise to better equip would-be teachers and, by extension, their future students for success.

Devil's Bargain

So-called normal schools, the precursors to today's schools of education, emerged in the mid-1800s to staff a growing number of classrooms, reports Stanford University historian David Labaree. To meet demands for more accessible higher education, they evolved into four-year teachers' colleges and then state colleges and universities by about 1960. In the late 1900s, some universities that didn't have colleges of education grew them.

From the outset, teacher-training programs faced what Labaree calls a "devil's bargain" between quantity and quality: producing enough teachers to meet demand, or preparing fewer teachers to high standards. Under pressure, he says, they chose quantity.

The sheer numbers of education students (who earn more than 7 percent of the bachelor's degrees and 29 percent of the master's degrees granted nationwide), combined with a focus "more on adequacy than on quality," Labaree says, turned education schools into moneymakers for many universities. "The ed school is the Rodney Dangerfield of higher education," he adds. "It don't get no respect."

No respect doesn't mean no expectations, however, especially not in the past fifteen years or so. A cry for better education programs is rising as the scrutiny on K-12 schools' performance under the No Child Left Behind Act flows upstream to the institutions that prepare teachers. Calls for change have come from both outside and inside teacher education. Add to that the growing competition from alternative certification pathways and homegrown programs like Boston's -- such avenues produced about 41,000 of the 220,000 graduates of teacher-preparation programs in 2004 -- and education schools are feeling the pressure.

"Criticisms of the teacher-education establishment have been so incessant and persistent that the work of that establishment is changing," says Suzanne Wilson, chairwoman of the Department of Teacher Education at Michigan State University's College of Education. "People are not ignoring the critiques anymore."

Prep Gets Real

At the heart of reform in teacher preparation are innovations that provide extensive field experience and link theory more closely with practice.

A mentor teacher speaking to a student teacher

Barbara Simon, mentor, Boston Teacher Residency:

"Some people have the philosophy that teachers should go right into the fire, and I disagree with that. There's some in-between that's good -- to gradually take on the role with some thought behind it, getting to observe before doing."

Credit: Gregory Cherin

Programs such as Boston's go the furthest by transporting the locus of training almost entirely from the university to the K-12 school. Through the four-year-old residency, supported jointly by the school district and local philanthropies, candidates take summer courses geared toward Boston's history and curriculum, then undergo a yearlong mentorship. The financial package -- an $11,000 stipend plus a forgivable tuition loan -- is designed to attract educators from diverse backgrounds. (Melissa Zipper, who survived her first year with help from an outside mentoring program and is still a teacher, had to shell out $19,000 for her degree.)

In between the stale old university methods and the urban teaching residencies is a practical and promising model that's gaining in reach: the professional-development school. As described by the National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE), these programs are partnerships between teacher-preparation programs and K-12 schools that provide settings for student teaching, faculty development, and field-based research -- unions so intimate that they form a hybrid institution. A typical field placement in these school-university teams -- which, as does the Boston program, liken themselves to medical residencies in teaching hospitals -- lasts a semester or two.

Kansas's Emporia State University was an early adopter of the model. Its Teachers College provides training and ongoing support to mentor educators in its thirty-four professional-development schools. In turn, mentors commit to give student teachers weekly evaluations and opportunities to do everything from individual tutoring to whole-class teaching. University staff visit classrooms regularly to assess candidates' progress and provide feedback. All the while, the educators-in-training reconvene in university classes to debrief and draw connections to theories of education.

"The key to the success of these programs is that no matter what theory students are learning about, they get to see it in practice immediately," says Dean Tes Mehring.

The payoff: The attrition rate of ESU graduates from teaching is a low 7.2 percent after three years, and principals rate alumni highly on a wide range of knowledge and skills.

Measure This

Besides the theory-practice bond, assessment -- the watchword in K-12 schools -- is catching on in teacher preparation. Education schools at the forefront of this change are creating and using various assessments to measure candidates' skills and identify and improve weaknesses in their programs. ESU, for instance, evaluates candidates via tests, observations, and performance tasks at regular intervals; those who perform below par -- about 4 to 5 percent of students per semester -- get dropped from the teaching program.

A teacher-education student at his desk

Pablo Aguilera, Stanford University:

"You can make people go to school for five years and tell them to read any number of books, but they won't really learn anything until they're in an actual classroom."

Credit: Bart Nagel

It may sound odd in this assessment-happy age, but no, education schools have not always done this. Some impetus for change comes from the NCATE, which accredits 632 of the nation's education schools. In 2001, the organization reinvented its standards to demand more evidence of program outcomes ("what candidates know and can do"), not simply inputs such as coursework and field experience.

Two teams of universities have created teaching-performance assessments that could be used more broadly. The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT), developed by thirty public and private universities, embeds various assessments in candidates' coursework and demands a capstone documentation of three to five teaching hours, including lesson plans, videotapes, and student work. Teacher Work Samples, an assessment methodology adopted by eleven schools nationwide in a coalition called the Renaissance Group, use detailed standards and a rubric to evaluate how well candidates teach a four-week unit.

Raymond Pecheone, co-executive director of Stanford University's School Redesign Network and PACT's project director, draws this analogy: "Back in the early '90s, we used to evaluate people's writing by giving them a multiple-choice exam. This is not rocket science, but if you want to test how well people write, you've got to ask them to write. These tests are sorely needed."

Two even more neglected but emerging education-school adaptations are training in how to use technology for learning, and induction support for beginning teachers after graduation.

Road Not Traveled

One problem in the quest for quality is that accountability measures so far have been mainly quantitative, not qualitative. The federal government, via NCLB, demands that, to be "highly qualified," teachers possess expertise in their subject matter and certification from their state. This requirement assumes that certification ensures skill. In reality, states generally focus more on the number and type of candidates' training experiences than the quality.

A state might require 300 hours of student teaching for licensure, for instance, but "rotten schools of education can place bad students in failing K-12 schools with weak teachers" and still meet the requirement, says Arthur Levine, former president of Columbia University's Teachers College and author of the 2006 report "Educating School Teachers."

Further obscuring the best practices, hardly any education schools have ever followed up with alumni to measure their effectiveness on the job -- until now.

"Historically, a school of education could claim to be strong and be recognized around the country with no evidence about how its teachers perform in the classroom," says the NCTAF's Thomas Carroll. "That day is over."

Early efforts at this kind of accountability have used simple surveys -- not the most rigorous form of research, but they're a start.

Another problem: There is little scientific evidence to guide the way. The small pool of research on what works in teacher preparation generally lacks rigor, and it dates to the days before many of these reforms came about. Education researchers have taken notice of the vacuum and have begun working to fill it, but evidence will take years to build.

A graph showing average student expenditure for various types of college programs

Click to enlarge picture

Source: Educational Policy, January and March 2000

More challenges lie ahead. To fully commit to a model of professional-development schools, for one, requires money. Emporia State University's Teachers College has managed it through permanent state allocations and strong commitment by the university, as well as by holding vacant some faculty positions and asking students to pay half of their mentor teachers' $500 annual stipends.

Marshall "Mike" Smith, education-program director at the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and a former education official in the Clinton and Carter administrations, says broad reform will come only if states revise their standards to demand more field experience with good supervision. According to data compiled by the Education Commission of the States, minimum requirements for student teaching now range from 180 hours in Louisiana to 100 days in Maryland. (The most common figure is about twelve weeks.)

States also must commit more money to preparation programs, Smith says, and teachers themselves must demand better training. What could incite that kind of demand? "Evidence that something else worked clearly better," he responds, "which we don't have."

The need is urgent; teachers work at the frontier of everything education is meant to do. Public education itself grapples intimately with big changes in America, from new languages to health epidemics to economic imperatives. Our answer to the challenge of improving teachers' training will influence the experience children have in classrooms -- and the skills with which children enter adult life -- for years to come. It's a question of what kind of future we want to create.

Grace Rubenstein is a senior producer at Edutopia.

This article originally published on 11/14/2007

see more see less

Comments (58)

Comment RSS
Anonymous (not verified)

Why would anyone want to be a teacher?

Was this helpful?
0

Even if you are great teacher and love your profession the benefits such as retirement are sad.
Most teachers in California must teach 35 years plus to have 80% of their retirement while prison guards, highway patrol, sheriffs, and other state employees retire with 100% percent of their wages. California pays well, but most retired teachers end up substituting in their own school district to compensate for their poor retirement. Why do teachers leave the profession? Lack of parental support, lack of time put in by students and parents to study, complete assignments, and study for tests (compared to students in China and Asia, discipline issues, student's lack of social skills, societal ills and the culture, and a dismal retirement.

Anonymous (not verified)

First year teacher preparedness

Was this helpful?
0

I recently completed an educational program K-8 in a NCATE approved university. I am a non-traditional student and also a first generation undergraduate. I managed to finish with a 3.8 GPA and experienced four in-service experiences at four different elementary school settings. I sacrificed my cabinet-making profession with a $40,000 plus yearly income including 100 percent paid medical insurance for my spouse and I as well as 3 weeks of paid vacation in pursuit of becoming a teacher on a Native American Indian Reservation School District. After relocating near the reservation school where I desired to teach in order to perform my final student teaching assignment, reality pierced me in the heart. No opportunity was available for me in this remote area after I completed my student teaching assignment. I also felt alienated by the districts pace setting policies which left little room for the ideals and conceptions I learned from the school of education that I attended. Now I am working a job as an unskilled laborer for ten dollars an hour to make ends meet. I should soon be receiving my “Initial Teacher License” from the state where I received my degree however, in the time lapse since I have been out of the educational environment; about six months now, I feel unprepared to enter a class as a first year educator. Nevertheless, I am looking for a door to open that will give me exposure to a school environment where I may possibly teach. I am also looking into doing some self study in the field of mathematics that will give me an edge should a door become open. I am not putting blame on anybody for my circumstances what I am trying to emphasize is that pursuing a career as a teacher requires the perseverance of a coyote and faith that it will happen which I believe can only come through my "Teacher" who gives me strength Jesus Christ my LORD. I am also thankful that I stumbled onto the teaching ideals from Edutopia which deviate from the norm; my hope is that America will experience an educational reformation that will enable more teachers to implement programs that utilize ideals such as Edutopia's into their curriculum.

Gina (not verified)

What about teachers who are "too well-prepared?"

Was this helpful?
0

I completed an education program at a small liberal arts college that required another major. I am terribly thankful for that. I understand that all of the theory is not what interests most people and is not what makes a great teacher. However, the valuable time that I spent developing my theories of power differentials in a classroom and contextualizing them in the historic trends of schooling were imperative to actually transforming schooling.

Unfortunately, it still seems to be the case that schools would prefer thoughtless, robotic teachers who do not need to think things through or create anything (including "teachable moments"). They would prefer a teacher-in-a-box who will simply follow a strict curriculum and pacing guide with poor, low-interest resources and no time for transformative learning, the only kind that gets kids engaged in the learning process and keeps them motivated to learn.

I was not trained for the ideal world, but I was also not trained to be an automaton. And that is why I am not teaching today.

Jill Kerper Mora (not verified)

Dangers of Mandated Assessments

Was this helpful?
0

I say amen to Duane Campbell's remarks about mandated teacher education (TE) assessments in California. TE programs throughout the state are struggling to implement burdensome systems of assessment that were conceptualized and encoded into law by legislators and bureaucrats who have no grasp on the realities of our programs and our teacher candidates. Under the name of Teacher Performance Assessment (TPA) our student teachers spend hours upon hours documenting, filming, and writing "reflections" on single lessons (called teaching events) that detract from their focus on becoming familiar with the curriculum, lesson planning, and interacting with and getting to know their master teachers and public school students. Then part-time and full time faculty spend hours upon hours reading and scoring these documents. This is maximally inefficient and ineffective way to assess student teachers' abilities because it is decontextualized from what really is happening (or has happened) in their real-time teaching and is heavily dependent on their writing skills rather than their actual teaching skills. The combined assessments of student teachers' master teachers and university supervisors who observe their growth in teaching skills over time are a much more valid and reliable evaluation of their performance as novice teachers.

In fact, research on the PACT support this concern. In describing the Teaching Event required in the PACT assessment system in an article in the Journal of Teacher Education, Pechoene & Chung (2006) indicate that there is a strong level of agreement between analytic scorings of the Teaching Event and holistic judgments by professionals as to whether the candidate should be granted a credential (.870 in the passing range of scores, .808 in the lower range of scores). In other words, holistic professional judgments correspond 80-87% of the time with Teaching Even scores. This means that in at least 13% of the cases, teacher educators’ professional judgment disagreed with judgments about whether or not student teachers’ met the criteria to earn a credential based on their performance on the Teaching Event alone. Consequently, some student teachers could be recommended for a credential on this basis of this assessment whose overall performance does not warrant it, and others may not be recommended whose actual classroom performance supports a positive judgment of their potential for being a good teacher.

The jury is still out as to whether the very labor-intensive and time-consuming TPA assessment system mandated in CA will actually produce better teachers or whether more potential and enrolled teacher candidates will find this system so onerous and burdensome as to negatively impact their decision to enter teaching and/or their completion of a teacher education program.

Ann Schulte (not verified)

It’s great to see an

Was this helpful?
0

It’s great to see an article promoting university-school partnerships, as the connection between these institutions is vital to the preparation of qualified, effective teachers. Both institutions need to support the connection of theory and practice. Neither one alone can adequately prepare teachers both with the practical knowledge necessary to meet the needs of students and the understanding of the larger role of education in a democratic society.
However, I’d like to know what research was referenced to say that, “Fenwick's experience is the exception and Zipper's is the rule.” The author offers one quote from one dissatisfied graduate from one program. Another quote says, “Half of all new educators abandon the profession within five years.” Does the research directly attribute this to ineffective teacher preparation programs? Or might this poor retention rate be related to a vast number of other challenges teachers experience in the over-standardardized, under-funded, low pay, low status profession? I’m simply suggesting that there’s plenty of blame to go around and we should be looking at the general lack of support our government provides education PreK-16. Again, the author offers, “Far too many universities, for their part, run education programs on the cheap.” This is particularly true of universities that are dependent on the state budget in California. Is this type of financial inadequacy really overcome by state-mandated, un(der)funded, standardized assessments like the Teaching Performance Assessment (aka PACT)? I think not.

Bernard Badiali (not verified)

Professional Development Schools

Was this helpful?
0

I found the article to be interesting and timely. More research in the area of innovative teacher preparation would have uncovered the growing movement of Professional Development Schools across the country. Three national organizations are devoted to PDS work: The National Network for Educational Renewal (NNER) has more than twenty colleges and universities working with scores or school partners. Likewise, the HOLMES Partnership fosters PDS work in urban areas throughout the country. The newest, and fastest growing organization, is the National Association for Professional Development Schools (NAPDS). There were profssional development school partners from 40 states at its annual conference last year. These three organizations are comitted to supporting exemplary teacher preparation across the country. I am proud to say that the College of Education at Penn State maintains an active involvement with all three national organizations. Please see our PDS website for more detailed information about the work we are doing in central Pennsylvania. You may want to include us in your top ten.

Miguel A. Velazquez (not verified)

Teacher Prep

Was this helpful?
0

I would like to promote the great teacher training program being developed at Illinois State University referred to as the PDS or Professional Development School. It is similar to the Boston experience. However, the Illinois State PDS targets several communities throughout the State of Illinois, both rural and urban. Students' reaction to the training is very positive. The Little Village Community pioneered the PDS for Illinois State University in the mostly Hispanic area of Chicago. Eli Whitney Elementary was the linchpin of this pioneering effort. I strongly recommend this model for any aspiring teacher.

Duane Campbell (not verified)

Teacher Preparation

Was this helpful?
0

Interesting article.
The description of the current state of affairs in teacher preparation does not match what I have experienced for the last 30 years. We have always had 50% of the students time in public school classrooms. And, since the 70's, we have had a close working relationship with these schools.
I would like to know how you selected your top 10 schools. What were the criteria?
Second, the description of PACT.
I, and other faculty in teacher preparation in State Universities in California worked to oppose this bureaucratic imposition of an unfunded mandate.
Experience using trial runs of this particular form of assessment lead many to believe that the TPA process in its various forms will not actually improve the quality of teachers nor contribute to closing the achievement gap. It will cost future teachers a great deal of time and money.
PACT may well be an improvement for the elite universities with small teacher preparation programs such as Stanford. There, the academic professors do not usually supervise the students teachers or interns. In such sites having a portfolio assessment may be better than a written checklist completed by teachers and supervisors from the field.
However, for universities with large programs the cost in time and money is substantial. For those of us at our lowly brethren institutions, advocates would need to demonstrate that PACT is a more substantive assessment than professors making 6-8 evaluative visits per semester to supervise the student teaching plus the evaluation of host teachers. This has not been demonstrated.
What we have is another imposed bureaucratic solution on teacher education by persons who do not work closely with teachers in the field.

For a detailed description of some of things wrong with PACT see the essay here:
http://coefaculty.csus.edu/campd/index.html

see more see less