Facebook
Edutopia on Facebook
Twitter
Edutopia on Twitter
Google+
Edutopia on Google+
Pinterest
Edutopia on Pinterest Follow Me on Pinterest
WHAT WORKS IN EDUCATION The George Lucas Educational Foundation
Subscribe to RSS

Three Steps to Critical Thinking

Edward Charles Francis Publius de Bono is a bona fide genius. The author, inventor, Rhodes scholar and Nobel prize-nominated economist graduated from college at age 15. In the field of education and business, he is famous for originating the term lateral thinking. In his spare time, he also wrote Six Thinking Hats and several other books on creativity. Of all his contributions to the field of education, there is one critical thinking method that I use in classes more than any other: the PMI, a brainstorming model built on the categories of plus, minus and interesting.

Creative and Critical Thinking Can Be Taught

De Bono repeats throughout his writing that critical and creative thinking can be taught. Reinforcing his belief, Common Core documents state that critical thinking is "a key performance outcome" -- it should be taught. I've used the PMI with second grade, middle school and high school students. Here are four classroom scenarios where the PMI can aid teaching and learning:

Teaching scenario #1

When you ask a volunteer from your AP English class to analyze the Gettysburg Address, not one hand raises.

Teaching scenario #2

You post an anonymous 10th grade argumentative essay on the document camera for your students to critique, but the same three volunteers who always answer are the only kids with comments to contribute.

Teaching scenario #3

You want to prime your 7th grade social studies students to look more deeply at the pros and cons of gun control legislation.

Teaching scenario #4

You can't think of a good pre- or post-reading exercise to tell your substitute teacher to use.

Handier than a Blendtec Countertop appliance, the PMI writing/thinking protocol is intellectually useful in dozens of contexts. Because it has never failed me, I want you test out the PMI this week, unequivocally confident that de Bono's strategy will enhance critical appraisal of any subject. A side note: writing is thinking; try typing a sentence without thinking -- it doesn't work.

The PMI Steps

Step 1

For two minutes in the plus column, write (with laser-beam focus) about all of the possible positive things regarding a subject or about taking an action.

Step 2

For two minutes in the minus column, write (with the focus of a begging Labrador) about all the possible negative things related to a subject, or about the negative effects of taking an action.

Step 3

For two minutes in the interesting column, write (with the focus of a pre-tenure NYU professor) about all the interesting things related to the subject, or implications and possible outcomes of taking an action, whether positive, negative or uncertain.

The PMI in Action

As I mentioned before, the PMI is useful in almost any process-oriented classroom context. It is particularly powerful for analyzing case studies and prewriting. To illustrate the later, let us imagine that my 1982 high school English teacher, Mrs. Beverly Forslof, tracks me down and asks me to write a "think piece" on the topic of drones. Furthermore, she directs me to demonstrate critical and creative thinking in fewer than 500 words.

I don't know much about predator drones, except that the U.S. military uses them extensively and that they are terrifying. Putting aside my ignorance, I set my timer for three two-minute intervals and develop the following PMI.

Plus Minus Interesting
Drones have successfully killed U.S.-identified terrorists. Drones separate the U.S. population and soldiers from the carnage that we cause. What if we had drone wars where all sides had only machines? Wouldn't this reduce bloodshed?
Drones won't get their users killed, as opposed to piloted aircraft. Drones have killed innocent civilians. Drone technology might also lead to furthering our trust in computer-driven cars.
Drones are less expensive than fighter planes. Drones can dehumanize killing from the perspective of their operators. The human costs and suffering that occur are less evident from a distance. The implications for loss of privacy are mighty.
Drones can secretly observe their targets for days to aid in striking the correct target and reducing collateral murder. Computers can be hacked. When are the drones going to be hacked and turned against us? Could the price go down and lead to personal smart drones? You could use drones to put your socks away. They might make unobtrusive always-on flying companions.
Research on drones can have implications for other peaceful inventions (like robot vacuum cleaners). Third World citizens resent our use of drones. Don't we come off like the Borg? Personal smart drones could spot your friends if they were nearby or help you avoid people you don't want to bump into.
Because young people are video-game literate, they can be trained to fly drones, eliminating the expense of training and re-training pilots. Drone pilots operating in Nevada can kill people overseas and, minutes later, play with their children. Making that fast a transition is a head-trip for pilots. In the future, drones could negotiate with other drones on your behalf. Indeed, drones might eliminate the need for people to learn certain literacies (business negotiations, stock trading, scheduling, clothing selection, house maintenance, reading).
It is important for our military to be peacekeepers -- a human endeavor.
Police will use drones more and more, thus further militarizing the police. A de facto military operating on U.S. soil sidesteps the U.S. Constitution.

Whew! That was intense! The six minutes that I spent working through the PMI protocol helped me arrive at a topic that I am passionate about exploring: not the drones as weapon aspect of the technology, but drones as precursors of technologies that empower individuals. My prewriting has excited my imagination; technology might herald the dawn of private smart robots, personal flying companions that solve problems for us and negotiate with other robots on our behalf -- a scenario envisioned by speculative fiction author David Marusek in Counting Heads. If we assigned basic literacies to robots, what literacies would then become critical for humans to master? That's a topic I've never really thought about before. Thank you, PMI! In six minutes, I surveyed possibilities and came up with an action plan, effectively jump-starting my imaginary essay. The PMI has never failed to generate an "aha" idea for me.

Edward de Bono came up with numerous other critical thinking activities that help students solve problems. Try out his To Lo Po So Go strategy. That link also includes numerous sponge and transition questions to nourish kids' creative intelligence. David Koutsoukis has compiled 50 more of these questions, with answers included.

Comments (3)Sign in or register to postSubscribe to comments via RSS

Sign in and Join the Discussion! Not a member? Register to join the discussion.