##### Assessment Subscribe to RSS

# Assessing the Common Core Standards: Real Life Mathematics

June 28, 2011 | Andrew MillerAnother buzzword that permeates the conversation around education is *relevancy*, and rightfully so. We want our students not only to make connections to real-world problems but also to do these activities.

However, it is not simply in the task that we want students to mimic real world connections. Students are already conditioned to do this. They are used to sitting and completing tasks. Even when the task might have great connection to the real world, it can still just be that: a task to complete. We need to keep this in mind when we ask students to perform real world math, just as the Math Common Core dictates.

## Taking a Closer Look

The following Common Core standard gives a great example and sets a solid tone for what can be targeted in math instruction:

In a previous blog discussing Math PBL Project Design, I wrote about reframing the word "problem," and pointed to this standard. For many of us, there is a very traditional meaning that is activated: a word problem in the text book, or simply a calculation to be made. In fact, the Common Core gives it as an example.

We can do better. We can assess learning in a much more relevant and engaging way. For instance, how do we assess this Common Core standard related to area and volume?

This standard is much less specific about what this might "look like" in the classroom, which leaves it ripe for innovation. There are a variety of products and contexts that could assess this standard. The major assessment, or culminating product in PBL terms, could take on the form of a podcast, presentation, marketing plan, or even a short story.

Other ways to assess this standard in imaginative, real-world scenarios:

**High school**students are creating a swimming pool that can meet the needs of all people who want to use it -- from those who have special needs to children -- and at the same time needs, it meets certain criteria in terms of standard amounts of water and size.**Middle school**students are in charge of designing a new and improved pyramid to be presented to the pharaoh, complete with a variety of antechambers.-
**Elementary students**are in charge of creating an organic garden to sell certain products at the local farmer's market.

## Criteria and Rubrics

A word of caution, don't give students the exact criteria, instead make them research and make decisions on what the criteria should be.) Again the genre is not as important as the rubric that demands specific criteria. As long as the rubric is clear and transparent where students must demonstrate math skills, include examples, etc., then we know that students are in fact learning and applying the Common Core standard.

If you as the teacher need a specific graph, then make sure to include in the rubric. If you need written explanation around the mathematical calculations, then demand it. If you need diagrams and measurements, then make sure the rubric demands it. Grading is not a surprise anymore. It is clear and transparent.

When looking at the potential for work with this Math Common core, make sure you have high expectations for the level of work your students can do. The old definition of the word "problem" is not rigorous. Redefining the word "problem" within the frame of Problem or Project-Based Learning is rigorous, and still demands real world connections in an authentic way.

If we want our students to really wrestle with math concepts, then we must create space for this work to happen, and create assessments that mirror this complex work.

## Comments (24)

Comment RSSSign in or register to post comments

## Call me old school, I do not

Call me old school, I do not agree with a pure PBL approach. There is nothing wrong with abstract thinking and learning. A "non real world math problem" IS a problem to be solved. Is a made up salary computation problem more "real" than a abstract algebra problem? I am not sure. By all means mix the two approaches. But to say that kids can only learn if it "feel real" is not giving young minds credit.

## Help with creating authentic real-world products.

I was committed to making changes in my geometry classroom during the past school year and I certainly had a lot of ups and downs! I focused on creating a student-centered learning environment rather than teacher-centered.

Instead of giving paper-and-pencil assessments for the last few topics I created a rubric requiring students to create a digital product. As you suggested in your post I did not tell them what their product needed to look like, but did tell them what they were required to include in their work such as at least 3 different geometric figures one of which needed to be a regular polygon with more than four sides and to provide calculations for determining the geometric probability of landing within a certain area. The rubric clearly stated what they needed to incorporate into their product to earn a perfect score.

Since this was the first time I assigned this assessment I did not have any exemplars but many of the groups produced some very interesting products. They were understandably concerned about how they were going to be graded because they had not been asked to do anything like this in any of their previous math classes.

Some students were very needy and kept trying to get me to "tell" them what I wanted them to do, they did not like the lack of structure since they were not given step-by-step directions.

The one aspect I could not find a way to incorporate into this assessment was an authentic real world connection. Do you have any suggestions for an authentic real-world product incorporating geometric probability for area or volume, that is something other than concentric circles?

## I have found

I have found http://www.worldwithoutoil.org is another real world application of problem solving along with google research tools.

## I agree with you about the

I agree with you about the word "problem". Most of the so-called "problems" in math are actually just exercises: Teacher models some procedure, they do a few examples together as a class, students try a few independently in class and then do a few more for homework. There is nothing wrong with spending some of the time in math class doing exercises, but students will never learn to THINK (mathematically or otherwise) unless they spend time actually practicing thinking. Having them solve actual PROBLEMS--where they have to figure out how to get a solution (and even what information they need) is an excellent way not only to get them to think but also to get them engaged.