Advertisement

Mr. Martin's Oopses: The Best Educators Have Struggled to Learn, Then Succeeded

A teacher must be bad at something to be good at teaching.

by Mitch Martin

Print Forward Share Comments(4)
Mr. Martin's Oopses
Credit: Indigo Flores

I am the worst guitarist in North America. I am also a solid and ever-improving high school English teacher. The two are related. Although some college educational programs appear lost on the point, a good teacher must be skilled in the subject he or she is teaching.

This is essential for the student -- but for the teacher, it creates a life that is conflicted, if not paradoxical. You must be very good at what you teach, therefore, you spend your life with people who often aren't nearly as good -- or as interested in -- the subject you love.

If I were put in charge of a college of education, I would attach a simple requirement to the foundation methods class: All students would be required to take a class in something they aren't good at, preferably something at which they stink.

Think about it: Many of the most skilled professional athletes make the worst coaches. Magic Johnson, for instance, was a rather infamous failure as a coach -- he couldn't relate to the lackadaisical attitude and poor execution of his charges. Many educators experience the same thing: "Why won't they simply do their work?" "I've explained this fifty times!" "What's wrong with these kids?" are familiar teachers' lounge refrains.

I have said the same things about my students; I've even said worse. But once a week, the shoe is on the other foot -- which is firmly planted on the wah-wah pedal. I always imagine Mike, my guitar teacher, somewhere in the middle of his 11:30 A.M. Saturday lesson, looking down at his watch and realizing there is nothing he can do to escape his noon lesson. The incompetence! The drudgery! The English teacher with the fumbling hands!

Mike is the best guitar teacher I've ever had.

My first guitar teacher was the opposite of me: a wonderful guitarist and a poor teacher. "Do this," he'd say. His fingers would blur up and down the fret board. I'd stare at him. He'd stare back. "You want me to play it again?" Sure, I'd say. Another blur. I lasted about six lessons, then, deeply embarrassed, quit playing for ten years.

My second guitar teacher was a fair instructor, but burned out and a little sad. He'd spend half the lesson talking about the guitar he planned to purchase, or the studio he wanted to set up in his basement. It was a little hard to blame him; I was quite a challenge.

Mike is the third bear in my Goldilocks guitar-teacher equation. In his guitar studio, a faded 1986 Stevie Ray Vaughan concert poster looks up at his secondary education diploma from Roosevelt University. He knows what he's teaching, and he knows how to teach. He breaks things down. He takes Eagles songs (the ones with the easier chords) and plays them at "therapy" tempo, or what a high school counselor might call "skills" tempo -- really, really slowly.

I do have just a smidgen of talent. After two years of lessons, I can sometimes hear a note in a song and reproduce it on my guitar -- a simple thing, but for the pitch-challenged such as myself, a revelation. I can play a few serious numbers and sing them at the same time -- "Old Smokey" and "Lyin' Eyes" for instance. This is a wonder to me.

Still, I have considered quitting at least three times this year. I have an eighteen-month-old son, a two-hour commute, and a pile of essays that is self-regenerating. I go weeks without practicing. I remind myself of the kid who shows up late with no pen four out of five days, a weary look on his face. (I am not advocating leniency here as much as understanding.)

Sometimes, I give up television for a week, hide out after my son goes to sleep, and actually practice what I was supposed to practice. I show up on Saturday ready to rock, and my guitar teacher doesn't even ask if I'm ready to play what we went over last week. No doubt he fails to do this because the chances of me having actually practiced my assignment are one in five. Nonetheless, I feel a bit like screaming.

It is in these moments that I gain a new understanding of what it's like to read Julius Caesar when you have no clue what is going on. I have actually looked out into the classroom and recognized the scrunched-up, frustrated look on my students' faces precisely because I've felt the same look come over my face as I mangle a Richard Thompson guitar lick.

They say failure is the best teacher, but I know better. The best teachers are the ones who have struggled and succeeded.

Mr. Martin's Oopses
Credit: Indigo Flores
Mitch Martin is a high school English teacher who lives in Naperville, Illinois. He is also a journalist whose articles have appeared in Naperville Magazine, the Chicago Tribune, and the New York Times.

This article was also published in the November 2007 issue of Edutopia magazine.


Appreciate your perspective

Submitted by Michele Harris-Padron (not verified) on December 11, 2007 - 20:33.

Have you heard of Guitars in the Classroom - it's a non profit group that has a developmental approach to teaching guitar to classroom teachers so they can sing songs with their classes - it's a great way to get started. I'm a GITC teacher and plan to share your article with my "students" - it will serve to give them perspective as well as perseverance as they learn. Learn more at guitarsintheclassroom.com

Great insight for parents too

Submitted by Michelle (not verified) on December 10, 2007 - 07:50.

As parents we often forget what it was like to not know or not be interested in a subject because it was hard for us then or because we didn't like the teacher. With 4 kids (college, HS, JrH and elementary) I've come to understand that often when a child "doesn't like" a certain teacher, it is actually an incompatibility of learning and teaching styles. Children want to succeed and enjoy but can be easily deterred by seemingly small obstacles. This article is great inspiration for the lessons of working hard and trying hard.

I agree with Mitch Martin in

Submitted by Annie (not verified) on November 28, 2007 - 20:00.

I agree with Mitch Martin in that teachers need to understand their students and how they learn. There is no sense continuing to teach the lesson the same way when they are not understanding. A teacher needs to be able to read her students and check for understanding. It does help students to believe in themselves when a teacher has tried and succeeded. I've gone through school being the "low student" who is struggling in reading and receiving average grades. I wasn't successful in school until I went to college. I share this with my students and tell them not to give up with learning, or listen to others who say they are not smart and can't do something. We need to be cheerleaders, encouraging our students, not giving up on them, and finding ways to help them learn. By understanding our students teachers are able to better support student learning.

Mr. Martin's Oopses

Submitted by Anonda (not verified) on November 26, 2007 - 15:48.

Everyone who is teaching should read this article. I struggled in school, but had people who thought I should be a teacher. They were right and I am good at it. On the other hand I have a sister who is very good at school and thought about teaching. I asked her if should could teach even those in her class that did not learn like she did. She is now entering med school. She knew she could not teach those who could not learn like she did.

Post new comment

Share your thoughts on this story. Please increase the credibility of your post by including your name and city, and by demonstrating respect for others' opinions. Comments will not appear immediately; all comments are moderated and will be posted in order of submission.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options